Comparison Overview

Pasha International

VS

Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles

Pasha International

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Presided by Vedat Erbas, Pasha Group was established as a legal entity in 2005 as Paramaribo Tourism Ltd. With its 1000 employees at present, the Group keeps growing, owing to the high quality and outstanding service principle it has adopted in tourism and entertainment. Today, Pasha Group has an essential place in the sector thanks to Golden Tulip Nicosia Hotel & Casino & Spa, a five star facility located in Nicosia, the capital of TRNC, Grand Pasha Kyrenia Hotel & Casino & Spa, a five star facility in Kyrenia, Acapulco Casino located in Kyrenia as well and Pegasus Casino situated in Svelingrad in Bulgaria. Pasha Group along with its President of Board of Directors Mr. Vedat Erbas and experienced directors, who are open and forward looking for new investments, continues its endeavours keeping the service quality at its highest in each sector it is present.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 108
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles

1 Ameristar Blvd, St Charles, Missouri, 63301, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

With an authentically designed 74,000 square-foot porte cochère derived from the historic wharf and train stations, Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles hints — thrillingly — at the action inside. The streetscape continues the theme by following the design cues of St. Charles Port District complete with restaurants, an arcade and a gift shop. The grand 130,000-square foot casino features the newest and most popular slot and video poker machines, a wide variety of table games and an exciting, nonstop action live poker room.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 184
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pasha-international.jpeg
Pasha International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ameristar-casino-resort-spa-st-charles.jpeg
Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pasha International
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pasha International in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles in 2025.

Incident History — Pasha International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pasha International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pasha-international.jpeg
Pasha International
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ameristar-casino-resort-spa-st-charles.jpeg
Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pasha International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pasha International company.

In the current year, Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles company and Pasha International company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles company nor Pasha International company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles company nor Pasha International company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles company nor Pasha International company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pasha International company nor Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pasha International nor Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles company and Pasha International company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles company employs more people globally than Pasha International company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Pasha International nor Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pasha International nor Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pasha International nor Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pasha International nor Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pasha International nor Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pasha International nor Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H