Comparison Overview

Pasco Kids First Inc.

VS

Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare

Pasco Kids First Inc.

7344 Little Road, New Port Richey, FL, 34654, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Pasco Kids First Inc. is a private, not-for-profit organization serving Pasco County since 1989 and Hernando County since 2007. All services are centered around the prevention, assessment and treatment of child abuse and neglect. The organization is headquartered in New Port Richey and has offices in Hudson, Dade City and Brooksville.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare

65 North Highway 101, Suite 204, Warrenton, Oregon, 97146, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare offers an array of services and programs, see list below. If you are interested in services please call us at 503-325-5722. To see our latest employment opportunities please visit our website www.clatsopbh.org List of services and programs Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare offers... 1. Adult / Child & Family Mental Health Services 2. Assertive Community Treatment 3. Care Coordination 4. Community Support Services 5. Crisis Assessment and Stabilization 6. Crisis Respite Services 7. Crisis Services / Mobile Crisis Services 8. Developmental Disability Services 9. DUII Education and Rehabilitation Services 10. Early Assessment and Support Alliance (EASA) 11. Family Treatment Court 12. Gambling Services 13. Happy Happy Baby (Pilot Project) 14. Head Start Consultation and Support 15. Mandated Treatment Program 16. Medication Assisted Treatment 17. Mental Health Treatment Court 18. Nurturing Parenting Program 19. Pain Clinic Outpatient Program 20. Psychiatric Services 21. Recovery Ally Mentors Program 22. Regional Parent- Child Interaction Therapy 23. Residential Services 24. School Based Services 25. Substance Use Disorders Services 26. Supported Employment (SEP) 27. Wraparound Program

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pasco-kids-first-inc.jpeg
Pasco Kids First Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clatsop-behavioral-healthcare.jpeg
Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pasco Kids First Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pasco Kids First Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare in 2026.

Incident History — Pasco Kids First Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pasco Kids First Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pasco-kids-first-inc.jpeg
Pasco Kids First Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clatsop-behavioral-healthcare.jpeg
Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pasco Kids First Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pasco Kids First Inc. company.

In the current year, Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare company and Pasco Kids First Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare company nor Pasco Kids First Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare company nor Pasco Kids First Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare company nor Pasco Kids First Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pasco Kids First Inc. company nor Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pasco Kids First Inc. nor Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pasco Kids First Inc. company nor Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare company employs more people globally than Pasco Kids First Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Pasco Kids First Inc. nor Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pasco Kids First Inc. nor Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pasco Kids First Inc. nor Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pasco Kids First Inc. nor Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pasco Kids First Inc. nor Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pasco Kids First Inc. nor Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N