Comparison Overview

parx casino

VS

Gold Rush Amusements, Inc.

parx casino

2999 Street Road, Bensalem, PA, 19020, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Parx Casino and Racing, formerly Philadelphia Park Racetrack and Casino, is the largest and most impressive Pennsylvania gaming complex. Owned and operated by Greenwood Gaming and Entertainment, Inc., Parx features 24 hour gaming; 3,500 slot machines; 140 live table games; a premier poker room with 60 poker tables; live racing and simulcast action; delicious dining options; bars, one of the hottest nightclubs around, and more.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 953
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gold Rush Amusements, Inc.

undefined, Hoffman Estates, IL , 60192 , US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Gold Rush Gaming is a full service Licensed Terminal Operator who specializes in Video Gaming. Since opening in 2012, Gold Rush has grown into one of the most respected and sought out Terminal Operators. With over 700 locations statewide, we provide unparalleled dedication and proven gaming knowledge. Join The Gold Standard!

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/parx-casino.jpeg
parx casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gold-rush-gaming-amusements-inc-.jpeg
Gold Rush Amusements, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
parx casino
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gold Rush Amusements, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for parx casino in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — parx casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

parx casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/parx-casino.jpeg
parx casino
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gold-rush-gaming-amusements-inc-.jpeg
Gold Rush Amusements, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

parx casino company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to parx casino company.

In the current year, Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company and parx casino company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company nor parx casino company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company nor parx casino company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company nor parx casino company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither parx casino company nor Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither parx casino nor Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither parx casino company nor Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

parx casino company employs more people globally than Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither parx casino nor Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither parx casino nor Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither parx casino nor Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither parx casino nor Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither parx casino nor Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither parx casino nor Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H