Comparison Overview

Parnell and Associates

VS

No groups on my page

Parnell and Associates

US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://parnell.protechmagazine.com

Parnell and Associates is a business consulting and technology concierge firm that specializes in solving real challenges for US military veteran professionals and businesses. We're military trained problem solvers, with corporate and professional consulting backgrounds and have owned small businesses of our own. We are NOT a non-profit organization. Instead, we are a group of professional managers, entrepreneurs, consultants and techs, veterans ourselves, who are willing to set aside our standard fees to help your business succeed. We function as consultants, managers and executives for our clients, an extension of your existing office team.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

No groups on my page

US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849
http://0

No Groups shall be connected on my page. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Parnell and Associates
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
No groups on my page
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Parnell and Associates
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
No groups on my page
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Parnell and Associates in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for No groups on my page in 2025.

Incident History — Parnell and Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Parnell and Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — No groups on my page (X = Date, Y = Severity)

No groups on my page cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Parnell and Associates
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
No groups on my page
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

No groups on my page company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Parnell and Associates company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, No groups on my page company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Parnell and Associates company.

In the current year, No groups on my page company and Parnell and Associates company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither No groups on my page company nor Parnell and Associates company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither No groups on my page company nor Parnell and Associates company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither No groups on my page company nor Parnell and Associates company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Parnell and Associates company nor No groups on my page company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Parnell and Associates nor No groups on my page holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Parnell and Associates company nor No groups on my page company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

No groups on my page company employs more people globally than Parnell and Associates company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Parnell and Associates nor No groups on my page holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Parnell and Associates nor No groups on my page holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Parnell and Associates nor No groups on my page holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Parnell and Associates nor No groups on my page holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Parnell and Associates nor No groups on my page holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Parnell and Associates nor No groups on my page holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References