Comparison Overview

Park Avenue Center

VS

Foundations Behavioral Health

Park Avenue Center

2430 Nicollet Ave, Minneapolis, 55404, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Park Avenue Center's mission is to Empower People to Improve Their Lives and we do so through our values-driven culture. Our values are: Clients First, Own It, Believe It, Get Better and Got Your Back. Our staff align with these values which supports our vision of being A Place where People Want to Work and Clients Want to Come. WHY PARK: • We Are Mental Health – co-occurring since 2008, on-site mental health clinic, support clients beyond treatment • Our Extraordinary Team – multi-year StarTribune Top Workplace, multidisciplinary staff, dedicated support team • We Get Issues – mental health, addiction, legal involvement, homelessness, family dynamics • Clients First Programming – gender specific, African-American specific, individualized care, complex programs, client choice

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 145
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Foundations Behavioral Health

833 E Butler Ave, Doylestown, 18901, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Foundations Behavioral Health provides innovative behavioral health treatment to children, adolescents, and young adults. Established in 1964, Foundations Behavioral Health provides treatment in a homelike environment located on a 12-acre campus in Doylestown, Pennsylvania. Foundations provides a comprehensive network of behavioral, psychiatric, educational, and community services offered for children, adolescents and young adults. As an Autism Spectrum Disorders Center for Excellence, we offer specialized care for ASD students who’ve struggled to find the kind of specialized care that will help them shine. Specialized treatment is provided in a secure, nurturing setting, where young people can work on the difficulties that are distressing for them and/or their families. With a licensed school, multiple residential facilities and plenty of activity space, our Bucks County, Pennsylvania, campus offers patients a restorative environment to focus on success. For our staff, successful treatment provides a full understanding of problematic behaviors/illnesses and provides individuals with tools and a compass to navigate life’s challenges.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 148
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/park-avenue-center.jpeg
Park Avenue Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundations-behavioral-health-doylestown.jpeg
Foundations Behavioral Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Park Avenue Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Foundations Behavioral Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Park Avenue Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foundations Behavioral Health in 2026.

Incident History — Park Avenue Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Park Avenue Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Foundations Behavioral Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foundations Behavioral Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/park-avenue-center.jpeg
Park Avenue Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundations-behavioral-health-doylestown.jpeg
Foundations Behavioral Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Park Avenue Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Foundations Behavioral Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Foundations Behavioral Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Park Avenue Center company.

In the current year, Foundations Behavioral Health company and Park Avenue Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Foundations Behavioral Health company nor Park Avenue Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Foundations Behavioral Health company nor Park Avenue Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Foundations Behavioral Health company nor Park Avenue Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Park Avenue Center company nor Foundations Behavioral Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Park Avenue Center nor Foundations Behavioral Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Park Avenue Center company nor Foundations Behavioral Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Foundations Behavioral Health company employs more people globally than Park Avenue Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Park Avenue Center nor Foundations Behavioral Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Park Avenue Center nor Foundations Behavioral Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Park Avenue Center nor Foundations Behavioral Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Park Avenue Center nor Foundations Behavioral Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Park Avenue Center nor Foundations Behavioral Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Park Avenue Center nor Foundations Behavioral Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N