Comparison Overview

Paradox

VS

EA Photography

Paradox

Postbus 113, Edam, 1135 ZK, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Paradox develops projects around contemporary issues with documentary authors: photographers, filmmakers, visual artists, writers and researchers. Since 1993 the non-profit has produced over 60 distinctive activities, travelling to some 120 venues worldwide. Among the projects realized are Maydan - Hundred Portraits by artist Emeric Lhuisset, Go No Go with photographs by Ad van Denderen and The Last Days of Shishmaref with filmmaker Jan Louter and photographer Dana Lixenberg. Within these projects we experiment explicitly with multimedia forms of presentation, and the interaction between different disciplines (photography, film, audio, writing) as well as platforms (exhibitions, websites, books, DVDs, tablet Apps and educational programmes). Our main goal is to reach a wide audience without losing the nuances that the addressed social issues require. This is the main reason behind our multiplatform strategy: one reaches a different audience with a diversity of platforms. But the synergy between different media as well as platforms also creates new experiences for an audience, raising questions in unexpected ways. Furthermore it challenges the notions and conventions around the presentation of (photographic) material leading to experiments mixing of old and new technology, media and platforms. Paradox seeks partners in realizing these kind of projects, in particular publishers, designers and partner institutions in the Netherlands and abroad. Exhibitions are created in close collaboration with museums and as a result travel to a broad variety of institutions, both nationally and internationally. Venues in which Paradox projects have been shown include FOAM (NL), Photographers Gallery (UK), Three Shadows Photography Art Center (CN) and Le Centquatre (FR).

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EA Photography

None
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

EA Photography specializes in bespoke images for wedding, special events, portraiture, fine art, and travel. The company is the result of a lifelong passion for photography. Realizing this passion early on the photographer, Emily Asche, has worked over the past 10 years learning and perfecting her art. Never one to settle for "good enough", Emily continues to study and learn from previous shoots and seeks out new experiences that will expand her knowledge and repertoire to provide better images and more options for her clients. Having photographed on four continents in a variety of settings, EA Photography easily adapts to meet clients' needs and help realize their vision. The company's goal is to meet and exceed expectations, creating lasting images that will be cherished for generations.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paradox.jpeg
Paradox
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kroshka.jpeg
EA Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Paradox
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EA Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Paradox in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EA Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Paradox (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Paradox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EA Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EA Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paradox.jpeg
Paradox
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kroshka.jpeg
EA Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EA Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Paradox company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, EA Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Paradox company.

In the current year, EA Photography company and Paradox company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EA Photography company nor Paradox company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EA Photography company nor Paradox company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EA Photography company nor Paradox company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Paradox company nor EA Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Paradox nor EA Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Paradox company nor EA Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Paradox company employs more people globally than EA Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Paradox nor EA Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Paradox nor EA Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Paradox nor EA Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Paradox nor EA Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Paradox nor EA Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Paradox nor EA Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N