Comparison Overview

PaperSkeleton

VS

Dulce Design Co.

PaperSkeleton

Aberdeen, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

PaperSkeleton specialises in designing luxury custom designs and paper goods for weddings & celebrations. Whether you are looking for save the dates, invitations or on the day stationery, PaperSkeleton offers a full service from creating design concepts to hand finishing touches. Karla will work closely with you to ensure that your vision is achieved on your very special day. Also offers full Graphic Design services.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dulce Design Co.

1424 11th Avenue, Suite 400, Seattle, Washington, 98122, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Dulce Design excels in the meticulous crafting of top-to-bottom lifestyle brands to support the success of new construction, remodels and repositioning projects–whether for a single building or an entire neighborhood. Our design deliverables span brand identity, positioning and naming, collateral and marketing materials, brand messaging, websites, sales and leasing centers, exterior and interior signage, and beyond. We have collaborated with over 200 multi-family, condominium and new home communities and luxury hospitality clients including Carmel Partners, Greystar Development, Thrive Communities and Roundhouse.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paperskeleton.jpeg
PaperSkeleton
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dulce-design.jpeg
Dulce Design Co.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PaperSkeleton
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dulce Design Co.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PaperSkeleton in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dulce Design Co. in 2025.

Incident History — PaperSkeleton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PaperSkeleton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dulce Design Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dulce Design Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paperskeleton.jpeg
PaperSkeleton
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dulce-design.jpeg
Dulce Design Co.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PaperSkeleton company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dulce Design Co. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dulce Design Co. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PaperSkeleton company.

In the current year, Dulce Design Co. company and PaperSkeleton company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dulce Design Co. company nor PaperSkeleton company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dulce Design Co. company nor PaperSkeleton company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dulce Design Co. company nor PaperSkeleton company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PaperSkeleton company nor Dulce Design Co. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PaperSkeleton nor Dulce Design Co. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PaperSkeleton company nor Dulce Design Co. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither PaperSkeleton nor Dulce Design Co. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PaperSkeleton nor Dulce Design Co. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PaperSkeleton nor Dulce Design Co. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PaperSkeleton nor Dulce Design Co. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PaperSkeleton nor Dulce Design Co. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PaperSkeleton nor Dulce Design Co. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X