Comparison Overview

Papercut

VS

Lyonsbennett

Papercut

49 Vicars St, Mitchell, 2911, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

Papercut brings your vision to life with inspired, sustainable design At Papercut we make green choices in every aspect of our practice, from consulting with clients about environmentally friendly design options, choosing printers with similar environmental values, using paper with recycled content and actively practicing recycling and low energy use in our design studio. “As a graphic design business, we have the potential to create a lot of waste. By being greener in our design studio we are helping to reduce our carbon footprint, and that of our clients. We offer better design solutions that are both environmentally responsible and more effective, and the only way to do this is to look at the big picture first."​ We pride ourselves on being a boutique studio that greets clients with a friendly and personal approach while offering innovative design. The Papercut team work across all aspects of visual communication from complete corporate identity packages to annual reports, magazine design and through to websites.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lyonsbennett

4-5 Ferry Wharf, Brighton, East Sussex, BN41 1BD, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Based in Brighton, lyonsbennett is a multi award-winning corporate communications agency specialising in annual reports and marketing communications for a number of plc and financial clients. Our philosophy is to produce creative, engaging and accessible communications in an environment where service is key. Influenced by the latest developments in best practice and corporate reporting trends, we help our clients communicate in compelling ways. By understanding their needs, objectives and audiences, we ensure their annual reports are effective investor relations tools providing engaging stakeholder communication. We understand the challenges facing businesses requiring high-quality, yet cost-effective approaches. Our close working relationships with our trusted suppliers ensure we always deliver value for money. Central to this is our transparent pricing policy, ensuring our clients do not pay inflated third-party costs for items such as print and photography. We deliver creativity and insight within the framework of a seamless production process.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/papercut.jpeg
Papercut
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyonsbennett.jpeg
Lyonsbennett
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Papercut
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lyonsbennett
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Papercut in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lyonsbennett in 2025.

Incident History — Papercut (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Papercut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lyonsbennett (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lyonsbennett cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/papercut.jpeg
Papercut
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyonsbennett.jpeg
Lyonsbennett
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lyonsbennett company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Papercut company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lyonsbennett company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Papercut company.

In the current year, Lyonsbennett company and Papercut company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lyonsbennett company nor Papercut company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lyonsbennett company nor Papercut company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lyonsbennett company nor Papercut company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Papercut company nor Lyonsbennett company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Papercut nor Lyonsbennett holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Papercut company nor Lyonsbennett company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lyonsbennett company employs more people globally than Papercut company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Papercut nor Lyonsbennett holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Papercut nor Lyonsbennett holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Papercut nor Lyonsbennett holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Papercut nor Lyonsbennett holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Papercut nor Lyonsbennett holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Papercut nor Lyonsbennett holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X