Comparison Overview

Papa Johns

VS

GRSA

Papa Johns

788 Circle 75 Pkwy SE, Atlanta, Georgia, 30339, US
Last Update: 2025-12-20
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.papajohns.com

Papa Johns seeks people who have an entrepreneurial spirit and share our philosophy for success. Hands-on training, a clean and safe work environment, quality business practices, advancement opportunities and meaningful work combine to produce not only the best pizza, but also the best team members! Better Opportunities. Better People! At Papa Johns we call ourselves team members instead of employees because we believe it is only through a strong team we can produce the best experience for our customers. Whether at our corporate campus, distribution centers, our restaurants, or located internationally; Papa Johns has a variety of positions for talented and passionate people. Papa Johns is an equal opportunity employer and provides excellent career opportunities for our entire team. Our company philosophies of promote from within and rewards based on performance are important elements of our company culture.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 25,896
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

GRSA

Rua Werner Von Siemens 111, São Paulo, SP, BR, 05069-010
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.grsa.com.br

GRSA - Soluções em Alimentação e em Serviços de Suporte Oferecer soluções de alimentação saudáveis e equilibradas, com os mais altos padrões de qualidade e de Acordo com as necessidades de cada cliente. Estamos presentes em empresas, escolas, hospitais, terminais de passageiros e em locais remotos, como plataformas de petróleo e até no meio da Floresta Amazônica, fornecendo 1,7 milhão de refeições por dia, em todo o Brasil. A GRSA atende a todas as necessidades de alimentação dos clientes, com soluções como: restaurantes, lanchonetes, serviços de lanches, coffee breaks, eventos, entre outros. Líder de Mercado Experiência de 38 anos no Brasil Normas de segurança alimentar mais rigorosas do que as exigidas pela ANVISA Controle de qualidade e auditorias em todas as etapas, desde a seleção do fornecedor até o consumo da refeição Processos padronizados de Segurança Ocupacional Flexibilidade no atendimento com soluções personalizadas Planejamento de cardápios e logística que permitem atender cerca de 2.000 unidades em todo o Brasil, com qualidade, pontualidade e padronização Acesso às melhores práticas globais, por meio do Compass Group, presente em mais de 50 países Multi-serviços. Isso a GRSA tem de sobra. Além dos serviços de alimentação, a GRSA oferece ao mercado diversos serviços de suporte, como: limpeza – geral e hospitalar, portaria, telefonista, recepção, manutenção, entre outros, em qualquer localidade.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 11,954
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/papa-johns-international.jpeg
Papa Johns
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grsaoficial.jpeg
GRSA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Papa Johns
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GRSA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Papa Johns in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GRSA in 2025.

Incident History — Papa Johns (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Papa Johns cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GRSA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GRSA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/papa-johns-international.jpeg
Papa Johns
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grsaoficial.jpeg
GRSA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Papa Johns company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GRSA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GRSA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Papa Johns company.

In the current year, GRSA company and Papa Johns company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GRSA company nor Papa Johns company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GRSA company nor Papa Johns company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GRSA company nor Papa Johns company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Papa Johns company nor GRSA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Papa Johns nor GRSA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GRSA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Papa Johns company.

Papa Johns company employs more people globally than GRSA company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Neither Papa Johns nor GRSA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Papa Johns nor GRSA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Papa Johns nor GRSA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Papa Johns nor GRSA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Papa Johns nor GRSA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Papa Johns nor GRSA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References