Comparison Overview

Pannone Corporate LLP

VS

Wiggin

Pannone Corporate LLP

378-380 Deansgate, Manchester, Greater Manchester, M3 4LY, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Our firm was founded through the acquisition, by our partners, of the majority of the commercial practice of Pannone LLP. We are proud of our history and our people have worked together, with our clients, for many years. We are solely focussed on providing clear and pragmatic commercial advice to a wide range of clients across the UK and globally, through our established network of associated law firms. Our clients include businesses, the public sector, charities and individuals. Our people are recognised for the quality of their work and their ability to deliver the highest level of client service. Most of our partners are recognised as experts or leading individuals in Legal 500 or Chambers and Partners. Please visit our website www.pannonecorporate.com for full details of the services we provide.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 92
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Wiggin

10th Floor, Met Building, London, W1T 2BU, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Wiggin is a law firm focusing exclusively on Media, Technology and Brands/IP. We advise clients on the financing, exploitation and protection of their creative and commercial assets in these sectors. Alongside its specialist commercial expertise, the firm provides a full legal service across corporate, tax, finance, litigation, employment and property. Wiggin’s clients range from leading businesses in broadcast entertainment, music, sport and publishing through to platforms, content retailers, gaming and technology companies and early stage entrepreneurs. The firm’s Brussels office provides legal support and lobbies EU decision makers on behalf of clients on a wide range of matters, including EU copyright reform, data protection, competition policy, trade and e-commerce. Wiggin has also built a network of trusted overseas law firms, with a similar media and technology focus, covering all key worldwide jurisdictions.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 286
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pannone-corporate.jpeg
Pannone Corporate LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wiggin.jpeg
Wiggin
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pannone Corporate LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wiggin
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pannone Corporate LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wiggin in 2025.

Incident History — Pannone Corporate LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pannone Corporate LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wiggin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wiggin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pannone-corporate.jpeg
Pannone Corporate LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wiggin.jpeg
Wiggin
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wiggin company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pannone Corporate LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Wiggin company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pannone Corporate LLP company.

In the current year, Wiggin company and Pannone Corporate LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wiggin company nor Pannone Corporate LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wiggin company nor Pannone Corporate LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wiggin company nor Pannone Corporate LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pannone Corporate LLP company nor Wiggin company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pannone Corporate LLP nor Wiggin holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pannone Corporate LLP company nor Wiggin company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wiggin company employs more people globally than Pannone Corporate LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Pannone Corporate LLP nor Wiggin holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pannone Corporate LLP nor Wiggin holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pannone Corporate LLP nor Wiggin holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pannone Corporate LLP nor Wiggin holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pannone Corporate LLP nor Wiggin holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pannone Corporate LLP nor Wiggin holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X