Comparison Overview

Panini

VS

iConcept Press

Panini

Viale Emilio Po, 380, Modena, 41126, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Established more than 60 years ago (1961) in Modena, Italy, the Panini Group has subsidiaries throughout Europe, Latin America and the United States. Panini is the International brand leader within the world of sticker and trading card collectables with over 1,200 collection launches each year and one of the leading publishers of children magazines and books, comics, manga and graphic novels, in Europe and Latin America with approx 8,000 publications yearly. Panini employs a staff of over 1,200. 150 territories are regularly actively engaged with Panini’s physical products throughout every part of the World.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1,135
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

iConcept Press

Unit E1, 4/F, Gee Change Industrial Building, Hong Kong, HK
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

iConcept Press is a multidisciplinary publishing company who helps academics make their work visible and accessible to diverse audiences around the world. Company Overview iConcept Press is a multidisciplinary publishing company established in January 2010. We help leading academics make their work visible and accessible to diverse new audiences around the world. Our goals are as follows: - To open the door to the world's library of scientific knowledge by giving people anywhere in the world access to the latest scientific research - To facilitate research and education by making it possible to search the full text of every article in our book, regular journal, pocket journal, and certain lecture notes for free - To enable scientists, researchers, librarians, publishers, and entrepreneurs to develop innovative ways to explore and use the world's treasury of scientific ideas and discoveries

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/panini.jpeg
Panini
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iconcept-press.jpeg
iConcept Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Panini
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
iConcept Press
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Panini in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for iConcept Press in 2025.

Incident History — Panini (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Panini cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — iConcept Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

iConcept Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/panini.jpeg
Panini
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iconcept-press.jpeg
iConcept Press
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

iConcept Press company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Panini company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, iConcept Press company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Panini company.

In the current year, iConcept Press company and Panini company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither iConcept Press company nor Panini company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither iConcept Press company nor Panini company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither iConcept Press company nor Panini company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Panini company nor iConcept Press company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Panini nor iConcept Press holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Panini company nor iConcept Press company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Panini company employs more people globally than iConcept Press company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Panini nor iConcept Press holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Panini nor iConcept Press holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Panini nor iConcept Press holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Panini nor iConcept Press holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Panini nor iConcept Press holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Panini nor iConcept Press holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.