Comparison Overview

Panic and Blues

VS

South Shore Mental Health

Panic and Blues

undefined, undefined, undefined, ng242tf, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Stuart Ennals - Business Plan Personal Clinical Appointments (“Panic and Blues”) and Mental Health Training I have over 30 years experience as a nurse and manager within Psychiatric Hospitals. Primary Care/GP Surgeries, private residential and nursing establishments and community care settings, including service users homes. Latterly my managerial roles involved me “Trouble Shooting” and improving the quality and performance of services and staff teams. Through this I developed keen training and business management skills, and I feel that I am particularly well placed to provide freelance training, and quality improvement advice on a self employed basis. Head Office 22 Claricoates Drive Coddington Newark Notts NG24 2TF Tel: 07734 053915 e-mail: [email protected] Training Packages aimed at all staff working with people who may, at some times, suffer from some degree of mental ill-health. They are especially aimed at general nursing and care homes, staff within Primary Care, and sheltered homes / cluster housing etc., where staff wish for a greater knowledge of presentations and simple methodology of appropriate mental health interaction. Topics - Dementia, Alzheimers Society Dementia Training Package,Psychotropic Medication – especially the main concerns for managers, nurses and key staff, The Psychiatry of Old Age, Depression – the signs, symptoms and treatment, Panic attacks and Anxiety – the signs, symptoms and treatment - A broad look at Psychiatry – what we need to know - Psychoses – a brief look at the impact of schizophrenia and bi-polar disorder etc All of the above can be either half or full day courses, dependent of the depth of knowledge required and the availability of staff. Prices - £400 per full day course £250 per half day course Certificates are given on completion and attendance.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

South Shore Mental Health

500 Victory Road, Quincy, MA, 02171, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Since 1926, South Shore Mental Health has been building hope and changing lives for children born with developmental disabilities and children, teens, and adults living with mental illness. Today, we have more than 700 employees based in Quincy, Marshfield, Plymouth, and Wareham, and our non-profit early intervention and mental health treatment and recovery programs reach 16,000 people annually from Boston to Cape Cod.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 216
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/panic-and-blues.jpeg
Panic and Blues
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-shore-mental-health.jpeg
South Shore Mental Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Panic and Blues
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
South Shore Mental Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Panic and Blues in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South Shore Mental Health in 2026.

Incident History — Panic and Blues (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Panic and Blues cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — South Shore Mental Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South Shore Mental Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/panic-and-blues.jpeg
Panic and Blues
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-shore-mental-health.jpeg
South Shore Mental Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Panic and Blues company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to South Shore Mental Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, South Shore Mental Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Panic and Blues company.

In the current year, South Shore Mental Health company and Panic and Blues company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither South Shore Mental Health company nor Panic and Blues company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither South Shore Mental Health company nor Panic and Blues company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither South Shore Mental Health company nor Panic and Blues company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Panic and Blues company nor South Shore Mental Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Panic and Blues nor South Shore Mental Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Panic and Blues company nor South Shore Mental Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

South Shore Mental Health company employs more people globally than Panic and Blues company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Panic and Blues nor South Shore Mental Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Panic and Blues nor South Shore Mental Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Panic and Blues nor South Shore Mental Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Panic and Blues nor South Shore Mental Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Panic and Blues nor South Shore Mental Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Panic and Blues nor South Shore Mental Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N