Comparison Overview

Panasonic North America

VS

Midea Group

Panasonic North America

2 Riverfront Plaza, Newark, NJ, 07102, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://bit.ly/2nrQeud

Panasonic is a leading technology provider of electric batteries and consumer lifestyle technologies, as well as innovative smart mobility, sustainable energy, and integrated supply chain solutions. Throughout Panasonic’s 100-year history, one of our guiding principles has always been to contribute to society by improving people’s lives and making the world a better place. The goal? To fulfill our Founder’s vision of making today better than yesterday, tomorrow better than today by empowering people to live better lives and creating a brighter future for everyone. Learn more about Panasonic’s technologies and solutions at https://na.panasonic.com.

NAICS: 335
NAICS Definition: Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees: 11,195
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3
View Profile

Midea Group

6 Midea Avenue, Foshan, Guangdong, undefined, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
https://www.midea-group.com/

Midea Group aspires to the vision of “Bringing Great Innovations to Life”, upholding the Founders’ philosophy of creating a better life through technology. Midea Group has evolved into a global leading technology company specializing in five major business areas: Smart Home Business, Industrial and Building Technologies, Robotics &Automation, and Digital Innovation. Over the past five years, we have invested over $8 billion USD in R&D and developed a global network spanning 33 R&D centers and 43 major production sites across the world. At present, Midea Group’s products and services serve more than 500 million customers in over 200 countries and regions encompassing a brand portfolio containing Little Swan, Toshiba, WAHIN, COLMO, Clivet, Eureka, KUKA, GMCC, Welling, LINVOL, and Wandong. With nearly 200,000 employees globally and more than 40,000 based internationally, Midea Group ranks 277th on the Global Fortune 500 in 2024, marking the 9th consecutive year on the list. The company holds A/A3/A credit ratings from S&P, Moody's, and Fitch respectively. Midea Group places a strong focus on technology leadership, driving innovation across global markets. Through continuous investment in "Technology Leadership, Direct to User, Digital Intelligence Driven, and Global Breakthrough," we advance our leadership in Smart Home and Smart Manufacturing while fostering talent. By providing growth opportunities in a dynamic, global environment, we empower our teams to shape the future of innovation.

NAICS: 335
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17,792
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/panasonic-usa.jpeg
Panasonic North America
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/midea.jpeg
Midea Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Panasonic North America
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Midea Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Panasonic North America in 2025.

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Midea Group in 2025.

Incident History — Panasonic North America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Panasonic North America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Midea Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Midea Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/panasonic-usa.jpeg
Panasonic North America
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Misconfigured DNS CNAME records
Motivation: Spread malware and perpetrate online scams
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/midea.jpeg
Midea Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Midea Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Panasonic North America company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Panasonic North America company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Midea Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Panasonic North America company has reported more cyber incidents than Midea Group company.

Panasonic North America company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Midea Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Panasonic North America company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Midea Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Midea Group company nor Panasonic North America company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Panasonic North America company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Midea Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Panasonic North America nor Midea Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Midea Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Panasonic North America company.

Midea Group company employs more people globally than Panasonic North America company, reflecting its scale as a Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing.

Neither Panasonic North America nor Midea Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Panasonic North America nor Midea Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Panasonic North America nor Midea Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Panasonic North America nor Midea Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Panasonic North America nor Midea Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Panasonic North America nor Midea Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References