Comparison Overview

Panasonic North America

VS

Midea Group

Panasonic North America

2 Riverfront Plaza, Newark, NJ, US, 07102
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Panasonic is a leading technology provider of electric batteries and consumer lifestyle technologies, as well as innovative smart mobility, sustainable energy, and integrated supply chain solutions. Throughout Panasonic’s 100-year history, one of our guiding principles has always been to contribute to society by improving people’s lives and making the world a better place. The goal? To fulfill our Founder’s vision of making today better than yesterday, tomorrow better than today by empowering people to live better lives and creating a brighter future for everyone. Learn more about Panasonic’s technologies and solutions at https://na.panasonic.com.

NAICS: 335
NAICS Definition: Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees: 11,446
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Midea Group

6 Midea Avenue, Foshan, Guangdong, CN
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Midea Group aspires to the vision of “Bringing Great Innovations to Life”, upholding the Founders’ philosophy of creating a better life through technology. Midea Group has evolved into a global leading technology company specializing in six major businesses including Smart Home Business, Industrial Technologies, Building Technologies, Robotics &Automation, Midea Healthcare and Annto Logistics. Over the past ten years, we have invested nearly 100 billion yuan in R&D and developed a global network spanning 38 R&D centers and 44 major production sites across the world. At present, Midea Group’s products and services serve more than 500 million customers in over 200 countries and regions, our brand portfolio contains Little Swan, Toshiba, WAHIN, COLMO, Clivet, Eureka, KUKA, GMCC, Welling, LINVOL, and Wandong. With nearly 200,000 employees globally and more than 40,000 based internationally, Midea Group ranks 277th on the Global Fortune 500 in 2024, marking the 9th consecutive year on the list. The company holds A/A2/A credit ratings from S&P, Moody's, and Fitch respectively. Midea Group places a strong focus on technology leadership, driving innovation across global markets. Midea adheres to the new strategic axis of "Technology Leadership, User Direct Access, Digital Intelligence Driven, and Global Breakthroughs," we advance our leadership in Smart Home and Smart Manufacturing while fostering talent. By providing growth opportunities in a dynamic, global environment, we empower our teams to shape the future of innovation.

NAICS: 335
NAICS Definition: Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees: 18,947
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/panasonic-northamerica.jpeg
Panasonic North America
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mideagroup.jpeg
Midea Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Panasonic North America
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Midea Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Panasonic North America in 2026.

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Midea Group in 2026.

Incident History — Panasonic North America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Panasonic North America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Midea Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Midea Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/panasonic-northamerica.jpeg
Panasonic North America
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Misconfigured DNS CNAME records
Motivation: Spread malware and perpetrate online scams
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mideagroup.jpeg
Midea Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Midea Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Panasonic North America company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Panasonic North America company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Midea Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Midea Group company and Panasonic North America company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Panasonic North America company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Midea Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Panasonic North America company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Midea Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Midea Group company nor Panasonic North America company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Panasonic North America company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Midea Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Panasonic North America nor Midea Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Midea Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Panasonic North America company.

Midea Group company employs more people globally than Panasonic North America company, reflecting its scale as a Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing.

Neither Panasonic North America nor Midea Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Panasonic North America nor Midea Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Panasonic North America nor Midea Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Panasonic North America nor Midea Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Panasonic North America nor Midea Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Panasonic North America nor Midea Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H