Comparison Overview

Panagon Systems

VS

Zarpac

Panagon Systems

51375 Regency Center Drive, Macomb, MI, 48042, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

PANAGON SYSTEMS, based in Macomb Michigan USA, is the largest aftermarket hydraulic piston pump and parts manufacturer in the North America, providing the largest variety of current and obsolete components. Most hydraulic suppliers import their parts for resale, having no control over quality and with no knowledge of the manufacturing process. Panagon is different with the ability to produce a product from the raw materials to a finished pump, assembled, tested, painted, and shipped from our facility, thus making our operation different from all others in the aftermarket industry. Manufacturing companies like PANAGON SYSTEMS are needed in the industry because the original product manufacturers from time to time phase out certain product lines based on application needs, customer demands and just a general need to keep pace with the worldwide competition on product variety. When they do that, there remains a huge amount of machines and equipment still in operation with these phased out hydraulic products which need to be serviced for many years to come. Most of the OEM manufacturers can support a breakdown situation thru their distributor network for current production product lines, but due to phasing out of old products, the customer soon finds out the parts are not available or if they are, the delivery time could be months or the cost is high because of manufacturing out of the normal production schedule. Under those circumstances the customers are required to look at other suppliers like PANAGON SYSTEMS for the replacement parts. PANAGON SYSTEMS attempts to fill the void OEM’s create by manufacturing the phased out, expensive, unavailable pumps, motors and transmissions, from companies like Vickers, Denison, Rexroth etc.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Zarpac

1185 North Service Road East, Oakville, L6H 1A7, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Zarpac is a recognized leader for OEE availability optimized integrated turnkey packaging lines, packaging line engineering services, and custom packaging equipment. Zarpac, along with ZPI and Statera are part of ProMach's Systems & Integration business line. This strategically important group within ProMach is dedicated to supplying services and systems that help optimize the performance of packaging lines for a virtually unlimited range of packaged goods. Zarpac, based in Oakville, ON, began operations in 1989 as an engineering services company focused exclusively on packaging automation. Our initial clients were H.J. Heinz and Proctor & Gamble. Zarpac's early successes with custom engineering services for packaging equipment attracted new customers and new challenges and the business evolved to have a focus on turnkey packaging lines, engineering services and custom design build packaging machinery. Zarpac joined ProMach in 2016 and in 2020 its software division, ZPI and its conveyor and robotics business, Statera became standalone brands within the ProMach family. Since opening our doors in 1989 Zarpac has completed over 2,400 packaging line design, engineering and turnkey packaging line integration projects. Zarpac is a recognized industry leader in the packaging industry, and we have distinctive expertise and experience with OEE optimized, single-source, turnkey packaging lines. Zarpac has completed packaging line related projects for hundreds of companies in over twenty different countries. Our customers range from global Fortune 50 retail packaged goods manufacturers to single location family owned businesses. Zarpac is a dedicated team of packaging line design, packaging line optimization and packaging machinery experts. We are specialists and we understand the value of having packaged goods production lines running at rated speeds and at maximum efficiencies. If you would like to learn more please email us at [email protected].

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 51
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/panagon-systems.jpeg
Panagon Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zarpac-inc-.jpeg
Zarpac
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Panagon Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zarpac
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Panagon Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zarpac in 2025.

Incident History — Panagon Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Panagon Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zarpac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zarpac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/panagon-systems.jpeg
Panagon Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zarpac-inc-.jpeg
Zarpac
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Panagon Systems company and Zarpac company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Zarpac company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Panagon Systems company.

In the current year, Zarpac company and Panagon Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Zarpac company nor Panagon Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Zarpac company nor Panagon Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Zarpac company nor Panagon Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Panagon Systems company nor Zarpac company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Panagon Systems nor Zarpac holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Zarpac company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Panagon Systems company.

Zarpac company employs more people globally than Panagon Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Panagon Systems nor Zarpac holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Panagon Systems nor Zarpac holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Panagon Systems nor Zarpac holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Panagon Systems nor Zarpac holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Panagon Systems nor Zarpac holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Panagon Systems nor Zarpac holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H