Comparison Overview

Panagon Systems

VS

Remote Control, Inc.

Panagon Systems

51375 Regency Center Drive, Macomb, MI, 48042, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

PANAGON SYSTEMS, based in Macomb Michigan USA, is the largest aftermarket hydraulic piston pump and parts manufacturer in the North America, providing the largest variety of current and obsolete components. Most hydraulic suppliers import their parts for resale, having no control over quality and with no knowledge of the manufacturing process. Panagon is different with the ability to produce a product from the raw materials to a finished pump, assembled, tested, painted, and shipped from our facility, thus making our operation different from all others in the aftermarket industry. Manufacturing companies like PANAGON SYSTEMS are needed in the industry because the original product manufacturers from time to time phase out certain product lines based on application needs, customer demands and just a general need to keep pace with the worldwide competition on product variety. When they do that, there remains a huge amount of machines and equipment still in operation with these phased out hydraulic products which need to be serviced for many years to come. Most of the OEM manufacturers can support a breakdown situation thru their distributor network for current production product lines, but due to phasing out of old products, the customer soon finds out the parts are not available or if they are, the delivery time could be months or the cost is high because of manufacturing out of the normal production schedule. Under those circumstances the customers are required to look at other suppliers like PANAGON SYSTEMS for the replacement parts. PANAGON SYSTEMS attempts to fill the void OEM’s create by manufacturing the phased out, expensive, unavailable pumps, motors and transmissions, from companies like Vickers, Denison, Rexroth etc.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Remote Control, Inc.

77 Circuit Drive, North Kingstown, RI, 02852, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Remote Control Inc. specializes in engineered valve control systems. Since 1988 we have provided solutions to match a vast array of valve and process requirements. Our timely quoting and reliable deliveries, combined with consistently providing the right solution, means you can confidently select Remote Control as your actuator and accessory supplier.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/panagon-systems.jpeg
Panagon Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/remote-control-inc-.jpeg
Remote Control, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Panagon Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Remote Control, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Panagon Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Remote Control, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Panagon Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Panagon Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Remote Control, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Remote Control, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/panagon-systems.jpeg
Panagon Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/remote-control-inc-.jpeg
Remote Control, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Panagon Systems company and Remote Control, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Remote Control, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Panagon Systems company.

In the current year, Remote Control, Inc. company and Panagon Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Remote Control, Inc. company nor Panagon Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Remote Control, Inc. company nor Panagon Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Remote Control, Inc. company nor Panagon Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Panagon Systems company nor Remote Control, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Panagon Systems nor Remote Control, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Panagon Systems company nor Remote Control, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Panagon Systems company employs more people globally than Remote Control, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Panagon Systems nor Remote Control, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Panagon Systems nor Remote Control, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Panagon Systems nor Remote Control, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Panagon Systems nor Remote Control, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Panagon Systems nor Remote Control, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Panagon Systems nor Remote Control, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H