Comparison Overview

Pan Macmillan Australia

VS

William Reed Ltd

Pan Macmillan Australia

Level 25, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Pan Macmillan Australia is a major Australian publisher and distributor, with a wide range of titles under the group imprints including Macmillan, Pan, Picador, Plum, Momentum, Macquarie Dictionary Publishers, Pancake, St Martins Press, Tor, Forge, Griffin and Sidgwick & Jackson. Its Australian publishing encompasses commercial and literary fiction, children's and teenage fiction, picture books and character product, Australiana, history, biographies, cooking, health and self-help, sport and travel.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

William Reed Ltd

Broadfield Park, Crawley, West Sussex, RH11 9RT, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

We are William Reed, the trusted digital, high value data and events business serving the food and drinks sector for over 160 years. Since 1862, we've been committed to creating impactful connections that inspire and empower our clients, harnessing the latest technology along the way. Today, we're recognised for outstanding multi-platform digital and print media, compelling research, powerful insights, innovative exhibitions and events, prestigious awards and informative conferences. We've been owned and led by the same family since the beginning, providing us with a unique long-term perspective and commitment to our industry that permeates our company. That's why our passionate and authoritative specialists are deeply engaged in their markets and seen as the most trusted professionals in their field.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 472
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pan-macmillan-australia.jpeg
Pan Macmillan Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/william-reed-business-media-ltd.jpeg
William Reed Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pan Macmillan Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
William Reed Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pan Macmillan Australia in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for William Reed Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Pan Macmillan Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pan Macmillan Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — William Reed Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

William Reed Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pan-macmillan-australia.jpeg
Pan Macmillan Australia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/william-reed-business-media-ltd.jpeg
William Reed Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

William Reed Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pan Macmillan Australia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, William Reed Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pan Macmillan Australia company.

In the current year, William Reed Ltd company and Pan Macmillan Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither William Reed Ltd company nor Pan Macmillan Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither William Reed Ltd company nor Pan Macmillan Australia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither William Reed Ltd company nor Pan Macmillan Australia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia company nor William Reed Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia nor William Reed Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

William Reed Ltd company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pan Macmillan Australia company.

William Reed Ltd company employs more people globally than Pan Macmillan Australia company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia nor William Reed Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia nor William Reed Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia nor William Reed Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia nor William Reed Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia nor William Reed Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia nor William Reed Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.