Comparison Overview

Pan Macmillan Australia

VS

Editoriale Lariana

Pan Macmillan Australia

Level 25, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Pan Macmillan Australia is a major Australian publisher and distributor, with a wide range of titles under the group imprints including Macmillan, Pan, Picador, Plum, Momentum, Macquarie Dictionary Publishers, Pancake, St Martins Press, Tor, Forge, Griffin and Sidgwick & Jackson. Its Australian publishing encompasses commercial and literary fiction, children's and teenage fiction, picture books and character product, Australiana, history, biographies, cooking, health and self-help, sport and travel.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Editoriale Lariana

Via C. Menotti 11/D, Milan, 20129, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-21

We publish the first wine magazine founded in Italy. We also organize events, tastings of very high level, such as VINOVIP CORTINA, a very well known summit. Now we also run a place called "enoluogo" in Milan, "the place of wine", where we invite graeat producers, wine lovers and wine pro. L'enoluogo is also a shop where to buy the wines we described in the magazine or in our promotional activities.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pan-macmillan-australia.jpeg
Pan Macmillan Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Editoriale Lariana
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pan Macmillan Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Editoriale Lariana
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pan Macmillan Australia in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Editoriale Lariana in 2025.

Incident History — Pan Macmillan Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pan Macmillan Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Editoriale Lariana (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Editoriale Lariana cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pan-macmillan-australia.jpeg
Pan Macmillan Australia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Editoriale Lariana
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Editoriale Lariana company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pan Macmillan Australia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Editoriale Lariana company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pan Macmillan Australia company.

In the current year, Editoriale Lariana company and Pan Macmillan Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Editoriale Lariana company nor Pan Macmillan Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Editoriale Lariana company nor Pan Macmillan Australia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Editoriale Lariana company nor Pan Macmillan Australia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia company nor Editoriale Lariana company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia nor Editoriale Lariana holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia company nor Editoriale Lariana company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pan Macmillan Australia company employs more people globally than Editoriale Lariana company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia nor Editoriale Lariana holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia nor Editoriale Lariana holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia nor Editoriale Lariana holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia nor Editoriale Lariana holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia nor Editoriale Lariana holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pan Macmillan Australia nor Editoriale Lariana holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.