Comparison Overview

Pamarco

VS

Printful

Pamarco

235 E 11th Ave, Roselle, 07203, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

With a history of innovation and achievement, Pamarco have developed a reputation for progressive product development and Industry leading standards of service, and offer a fully integrated package of products and services. The company has seven strategically located manufacturing plants around the world and a global network of technical sales representatives.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 135
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Printful

11025 Westlake Dr, Charlotte, NC, US, 28273
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Printful is an on-demand printing and fulfillment company that helps brands scale their businesses without the risks of holding inventory. We fulfill and ship custom clothing, accessories, and home & living items on demand. Each item is made only once it’s ordered and paid for. Our customers range from ecommerce entrepreneurs with hundreds of orders a year to global brands that trust us to fulfill tens of thousands of orders monthly. In November of 2024, Printful merged with production-on-demand powerhouse, Printify, to form one combined company. The two leading platforms remain, but they’re powered by one world-class team dedicated to helping ecommerce businesses around the world find their success.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 890
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pamarco.jpeg
Pamarco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printful.jpeg
Printful
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pamarco
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Printful
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pamarco in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Printful in 2025.

Incident History — Pamarco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pamarco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Printful (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Printful cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pamarco.jpeg
Pamarco
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printful.jpeg
Printful
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Printful company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pamarco company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Printful company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pamarco company.

In the current year, Printful company and Pamarco company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Printful company nor Pamarco company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Printful company nor Pamarco company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Printful company nor Pamarco company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pamarco company nor Printful company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pamarco nor Printful holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Printful company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pamarco company.

Printful company employs more people globally than Pamarco company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Pamarco nor Printful holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pamarco nor Printful holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pamarco nor Printful holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pamarco nor Printful holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pamarco nor Printful holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pamarco nor Printful holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N