Comparison Overview

Paluch Law, P.C.

VS

McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP

Paluch Law, P.C.

6080 Center Dr, Los Angeles, California, 90045, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Paluch Law brings a unique combination of experience with a solid understanding of the challenges that clients in these heavily regulated industries face. Our counsel considers the government’s perspective and connects the dots to ensure your business is in compliance while also achieving your business goals. We partner with healthcare and life science industry clients, from small startups to large multinational companies, guiding them through complex legal issues, and crafting successful legal strategies while keeping our clients’ business goals at the forefront. We bring a unique combination of experience at top-tier law firms and in-house with industry leaders. This background gives us a solid understanding of the challenges that clients face, the ability to integrate seamlessly with their team, and the insight to provide big-picture thinking, especially in uncertain times of change in these heavily regulated industries. We are passionate about serving as a champion for our clients, to earn their consistent praise of our exceptional communication and negotiation skills. We pride myself on delivering efficient, client-centric legal services, helping advance business objectives while recognizing that legal services are always a cost center for the client. Having in-house experience, we appreciate the budget limitations that exist and work with our clients to minimize legal expenses and stay on budget while providing sophisticated legal counsel. As a boutique firm, we are free from the constraints and billable requirements of Big Law, and work with our clients to tailor the scope of services in advance to maximize value, create predictability and avoid surprises.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP

10866 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1400, Los Angeles, California, 90024, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

McNicholas & McNicholas, a Los Angeles-based plaintiff’s trial law firm, represents clients in the areas of catastrophic personal injury, employment law, class actions, sexual abuse and other consumer-oriented matters such as civil rights, aviation disasters and product liability. Founded by a family of attorneys spanning three generations, McNicholas & McNicholas has been trying cases to jury verdict on behalf of their clients for more than five decades. This feed is NOT legal advice; it is a discussion of some past and current experiences in California. If you are outside of California, seek local legal advice immediately.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paluch-law-p-c.jpeg
Paluch Law, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcnicholas-&-mcnicholas-llp.jpeg
McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Paluch Law, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Paluch Law, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Paluch Law, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Paluch Law, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paluch-law-p-c.jpeg
Paluch Law, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcnicholas-&-mcnicholas-llp.jpeg
McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Paluch Law, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Paluch Law, P.C. company.

In the current year, McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP company and Paluch Law, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP company nor Paluch Law, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP company nor Paluch Law, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP company nor Paluch Law, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Paluch Law, P.C. company nor McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Paluch Law, P.C. nor McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Paluch Law, P.C. company nor McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP company employs more people globally than Paluch Law, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Paluch Law, P.C. nor McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Paluch Law, P.C. nor McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Paluch Law, P.C. nor McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Paluch Law, P.C. nor McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Paluch Law, P.C. nor McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Paluch Law, P.C. nor McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X