Comparison Overview

Palos Verdes Library District

VS

Tacoma Public Library

Palos Verdes Library District

701 Silver Spur Road, Rolling Hills Estates, CA, 90274, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Palos Verdes Library District is a nationally recognized, award-winning library system serving all four cities on the beautiful Palos Verdes Peninsula. We collaborate with our community to create environments for learning and inspiration, and to share the unique history of the Peninsula. PVLD is an independent special district governed by a publicly elected Board of Trustees.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tacoma Public Library

1102 Tacoma Ave S, None, Tacoma, WA, US, 98402
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Tacoma Public Library serves the residents of Tacoma, Washington. It operates eight library branches, which include a central library in downtown Tacoma, two regional locations in north and south Tacoma, and in five neighborhoods. Tacoma library has nearly 170,000 registered users, and close to 1 million items in circulation. Tacoma Public Library System serves a population of 210,000 people.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palos-verdes-library-district.jpeg
Palos Verdes Library District
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tacoma-public-library-system.jpeg
Tacoma Public Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Palos Verdes Library District
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tacoma Public Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Palos Verdes Library District in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tacoma Public Library in 2025.

Incident History — Palos Verdes Library District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Palos Verdes Library District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tacoma Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tacoma Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palos-verdes-library-district.jpeg
Palos Verdes Library District
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tacoma-public-library-system.jpeg
Tacoma Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Palos Verdes Library District company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tacoma Public Library company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tacoma Public Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Palos Verdes Library District company.

In the current year, Tacoma Public Library company and Palos Verdes Library District company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tacoma Public Library company nor Palos Verdes Library District company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tacoma Public Library company nor Palos Verdes Library District company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tacoma Public Library company nor Palos Verdes Library District company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Palos Verdes Library District company nor Tacoma Public Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Palos Verdes Library District nor Tacoma Public Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Palos Verdes Library District company nor Tacoma Public Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Palos Verdes Library District company employs more people globally than Tacoma Public Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Palos Verdes Library District nor Tacoma Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Palos Verdes Library District nor Tacoma Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Palos Verdes Library District nor Tacoma Public Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Palos Verdes Library District nor Tacoma Public Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Palos Verdes Library District nor Tacoma Public Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Palos Verdes Library District nor Tacoma Public Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H