Comparison Overview

Palantir

VS

PEMEX

Palantir

250 2nd St. SW #800 Calgary, AB T2P0C1, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 800 and 849

3esi-Enersight and Palantir Solutions have joined forces to form Aucerna, the energy industry’s leading provider of solutions for integrated planning, operations and reserves. Palantir is now Aucerna. Follow us at https://www.linkedin.com/company/aucerna/ Show more Show less

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PEMEX

Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Petróleos Mexicanos es la mayor empresa de México, el mayor contribuyente fiscal del país, así como una de las empresas más grandes de América Latina. Es de las pocas empresas petroleras del mundo que desarrolla toda la cadena productiva de la industria, desde la exploración, hasta la distribución y comercialización de productos finales, incluyendo la petroquímica. Pemex contribuye el 35% del PEF, en otras palabras aporta 1 de cada 3 pesos para la construcción de escuelas, carreteras y hospitales. La tasa de éxito en exploración en aguas profundas es del 50% siendo superior al estándar internacional. En el 2014 las inversiones fueron por más de 25 mil millones de dólares. Pemex generó más de medio millón de empleos indirectos. Anualmente Pemex invierte cerca de 140 millones de dólares en donativos

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 42,434
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palantir.jpeg
Palantir
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pemex.jpeg
PEMEX
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Palantir
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PEMEX
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Palantir in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PEMEX in 2025.

Incident History — Palantir (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Palantir cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PEMEX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PEMEX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palantir.jpeg
Palantir
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pemex.jpeg
PEMEX
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2019
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: DoppelPaymer Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Palantir company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PEMEX company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

PEMEX company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Palantir company has not reported any.

In the current year, PEMEX company and Palantir company have not reported any cyber incidents.

PEMEX company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Palantir company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither PEMEX company nor Palantir company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PEMEX company nor Palantir company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Palantir company nor PEMEX company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Palantir nor PEMEX holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Palantir company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PEMEX company.

PEMEX company employs more people globally than Palantir company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither Palantir nor PEMEX holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Palantir nor PEMEX holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Palantir nor PEMEX holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Palantir nor PEMEX holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Palantir nor PEMEX holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Palantir nor PEMEX holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H