Comparison Overview

Palace Casino Resort

VS

France Pari

Palace Casino Resort

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Palace Casino Resort is the only smoke free casino on the Mississippi Gulf Coast and the premiere destination for luxurious accommodations, superior guest service and endless excitement. Nestled along the beautiful Gulf of Mexico and Biloxi’s Back Bay, the resort offers hotel rooms and suites with stunning views, award winning restaurants, non-stop gaming, championship golf at The Preserve Golf Club and amazing amenities to complement your stay.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 197
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

France Pari

425 rue Jean Rostand, Labège, undefined, 31670, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Créée en 2008, la société est un des 10 opérateurs de paris sportifs et de paris hippiques autorisés à opérer en France dans le cadre d'une licence qui lui a été délivrée par l'Autorité de Régulation des Jeux en Ligne (ARJEL) en juin 2010. La part de marché de la société n'a cessé de croitre depuis le lancement de son activité, que ce soit par croissance interne ou par des opérations de croissance externe (rachat de BETNET en décembre 2011). La société propose une des offres les plus larges de paris sur le marché français : paris en direct, paris d'avant match, grille de lotto Combino avec des jackpots attractifs. Le site dispose d'une version optimisée de son site pour tous les mobiles. La société compte parmi ses actionnaires et ambassadeurs 3 champions sportifs français : Alain Prost, quadruple champion du monde de Formule1, Franck Leboeuf, Champion du monde 1998 de football et Fabien Pelous, Vice Champion du Monde de Rugby 1999. Depuis 2 ans, la société a au ssi lancé une activités de mise à disposition de plateforme de paris pour d'autres opérateurs.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palace-casino-resort.jpeg
Palace Casino Resort
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/france-pari.jpeg
France Pari
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Palace Casino Resort
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
France Pari
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Palace Casino Resort in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for France Pari in 2025.

Incident History — Palace Casino Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Palace Casino Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — France Pari (X = Date, Y = Severity)

France Pari cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palace-casino-resort.jpeg
Palace Casino Resort
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/france-pari.jpeg
France Pari
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Palace Casino Resort company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to France Pari company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, France Pari company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Palace Casino Resort company.

In the current year, France Pari company and Palace Casino Resort company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither France Pari company nor Palace Casino Resort company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither France Pari company nor Palace Casino Resort company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither France Pari company nor Palace Casino Resort company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Palace Casino Resort company nor France Pari company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Palace Casino Resort nor France Pari holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Palace Casino Resort company nor France Pari company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Palace Casino Resort company employs more people globally than France Pari company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Palace Casino Resort nor France Pari holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Palace Casino Resort nor France Pari holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Palace Casino Resort nor France Pari holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Palace Casino Resort nor France Pari holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Palace Casino Resort nor France Pari holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Palace Casino Resort nor France Pari holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H