Comparison Overview

Pacific Union College

VS

University of Missouri-Columbia

Pacific Union College

One Angwin Ave, Angwin, California, 94508-9707, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

For over 130 years, PUC has prepared students to lead lives of significance and service. As a fully accredited Seventh-day Adventist Christian liberal arts college, PUC will provide you with all the advantages of a larger university—a strong academic reputation; over 70 degrees and programs; cutting edge research; classes taught by Fulbright scholars; and a diverse student body—but with the benefits of a small college focused on the undergraduate experience and in an atmosphere of Christian community. As an added bonus, you’ll live and learn in the breathtakingly beautiful Napa Valley area of Northern California. Pacific Union College is a fully accredited institution by the WASC Senior College and University Commission (WSCUC) until 2026. In addition to the WSCUC accreditation, PUC has also received specialized accreditation from various organizations.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 571
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

University of Missouri-Columbia

105 Jesse Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

We are Mizzou! Our distinct mission, as Missouri's only state-supported member of the Association of American Universities, is to provide all Missourians the benefits of a world-class research university. We are stewards and builders of a priceless state resource, a unique physical infrastructure and scholarly environment in which our tightly interlocked missions of teaching, research, service and economic development work together on behalf of all citizens. Students work side by side with some of the world's best faculty to advance the arts and humanities, the sciences, and the professions. Scholarship and teaching are daily driven by a sense of public service — the obligation to produce and disseminate knowledge that will improve the quality of life in the state, the nation and the world.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 14,184
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-union-college.jpeg
Pacific Union College
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-missouri.jpeg
University of Missouri-Columbia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pacific Union College
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Missouri-Columbia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pacific Union College in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Missouri-Columbia in 2025.

Incident History — Pacific Union College (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pacific Union College cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Missouri-Columbia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Missouri-Columbia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-union-college.jpeg
Pacific Union College
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-missouri.jpeg
University of Missouri-Columbia
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

University of Missouri-Columbia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pacific Union College company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Pacific Union College and University of Missouri-Columbia have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, University of Missouri-Columbia company and Pacific Union College company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Missouri-Columbia company nor Pacific Union College company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Missouri-Columbia company nor Pacific Union College company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Pacific Union College company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while University of Missouri-Columbia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

University of Missouri-Columbia company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Pacific Union College company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Pacific Union College nor University of Missouri-Columbia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Missouri-Columbia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pacific Union College company.

University of Missouri-Columbia company employs more people globally than Pacific Union College company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Pacific Union College nor University of Missouri-Columbia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pacific Union College nor University of Missouri-Columbia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pacific Union College nor University of Missouri-Columbia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pacific Union College nor University of Missouri-Columbia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pacific Union College nor University of Missouri-Columbia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pacific Union College nor University of Missouri-Columbia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X