Comparison Overview

Pacific Strategies

VS

Earnscliffe Strategies

Pacific Strategies

None
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Orange County-based public affairs consultancy specializing in strategic communications, social media, government relations, community outreach strategies and opinion management. Our principals bring many years senior-level public affairs experience, garnered in both the private and public sectors, working with organizations and individuals at the national, state and local level. Clients benefit from sound strategic counsel and support to guide them successfully through the public policy arena. We help local governments build modern, transparent public communications infrastructure that take full advantage of powerful social media tools -- enabling them to engage in productive, positive communication with constituents, as well as internally. Our current and past clients include: Irvine Ranch Water District, the City of Anaheim, the Orange County Transportation Authority, the City of Westminster, the Children and Families Commission of Orange County and the Orange County District Attorney’s office.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Earnscliffe Strategies

46 Elgin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 1C7, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1989 and independently owned by our principals, Earnscliffe operates from offices in Ottawa-Gatineau, Toronto and Vancouver. We offer our clients a unique understanding of the country and where it intersects in the world. Our leadership team includes former government policymakers, business leaders, academics, award-winning journalists and public opinion analysts. We are a recognized leader in each of our service offerings: government relations, communications and digital, and opinion research. Our strength is in understanding our clients, their environment, and the environment in which decisions are being made that will affect them and their outcomes – and then translating that into the necessary strategies for our clients to succeed. Our longevity and success are based on one key principle: providing our clients with the best available advice. Period. Earnscliffe is also a member of Fipra International Ltd., an international network of independent strategic advisors operating in over 50 countries – meaning full global reach while preserving the service excellence and senior expertise of an independent firm. Through our affiliation with Fipra, we also have representatives in Brussels and China.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 94
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-strategies.jpeg
Pacific Strategies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-earnscliffe-strategy-group.jpeg
Earnscliffe Strategies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pacific Strategies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Earnscliffe Strategies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pacific Strategies in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Earnscliffe Strategies in 2025.

Incident History — Pacific Strategies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pacific Strategies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Earnscliffe Strategies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Earnscliffe Strategies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-strategies.jpeg
Pacific Strategies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-earnscliffe-strategy-group.jpeg
Earnscliffe Strategies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pacific Strategies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Earnscliffe Strategies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Earnscliffe Strategies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pacific Strategies company.

In the current year, Earnscliffe Strategies company and Pacific Strategies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Earnscliffe Strategies company nor Pacific Strategies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Earnscliffe Strategies company nor Pacific Strategies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Earnscliffe Strategies company nor Pacific Strategies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pacific Strategies company nor Earnscliffe Strategies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pacific Strategies nor Earnscliffe Strategies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pacific Strategies company nor Earnscliffe Strategies company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Earnscliffe Strategies company employs more people globally than Pacific Strategies company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Pacific Strategies nor Earnscliffe Strategies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pacific Strategies nor Earnscliffe Strategies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pacific Strategies nor Earnscliffe Strategies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pacific Strategies nor Earnscliffe Strategies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pacific Strategies nor Earnscliffe Strategies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pacific Strategies nor Earnscliffe Strategies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N