Comparison Overview

Pacific Strategies

VS

Public and Commercial Services Union

Pacific Strategies

None
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Orange County-based public affairs consultancy specializing in strategic communications, social media, government relations, community outreach strategies and opinion management. Our principals bring many years senior-level public affairs experience, garnered in both the private and public sectors, working with organizations and individuals at the national, state and local level. Clients benefit from sound strategic counsel and support to guide them successfully through the public policy arena. We help local governments build modern, transparent public communications infrastructure that take full advantage of powerful social media tools -- enabling them to engage in productive, positive communication with constituents, as well as internally. Our current and past clients include: Irvine Ranch Water District, the City of Anaheim, the Orange County Transportation Authority, the City of Westminster, the Children and Families Commission of Orange County and the Orange County District Attorney’s office.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Public and Commercial Services Union

160 Falcon Road, London, GB, SW11 2LN
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

The Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) is one of the largest trade unions in the UK, with around 200,000 members. We are organised throughout the civil service and government agencies, making us the UK’s largest civil service trade union. We also organise widely in the private sector, usually in areas that have been privatised. We are a democratic organisation, run by our members, for our members. We campaign for fair pay and conditions, decent pensions for all and equality in the workplace and beyond. If you're not a member of PCS, there's never been a better time to join the union.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 164
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-strategies.jpeg
Pacific Strategies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-and-commercial-services-union.jpeg
Public and Commercial Services Union
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pacific Strategies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Public and Commercial Services Union
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pacific Strategies in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public and Commercial Services Union in 2025.

Incident History — Pacific Strategies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pacific Strategies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Public and Commercial Services Union (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Public and Commercial Services Union cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-strategies.jpeg
Pacific Strategies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-and-commercial-services-union.jpeg
Public and Commercial Services Union
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pacific Strategies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Public and Commercial Services Union company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Public and Commercial Services Union company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pacific Strategies company.

In the current year, Public and Commercial Services Union company and Pacific Strategies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Public and Commercial Services Union company nor Pacific Strategies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Public and Commercial Services Union company nor Pacific Strategies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Public and Commercial Services Union company nor Pacific Strategies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pacific Strategies company nor Public and Commercial Services Union company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pacific Strategies nor Public and Commercial Services Union holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pacific Strategies company nor Public and Commercial Services Union company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Public and Commercial Services Union company employs more people globally than Pacific Strategies company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Pacific Strategies nor Public and Commercial Services Union holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pacific Strategies nor Public and Commercial Services Union holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pacific Strategies nor Public and Commercial Services Union holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pacific Strategies nor Public and Commercial Services Union holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pacific Strategies nor Public and Commercial Services Union holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pacific Strategies nor Public and Commercial Services Union holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N