Comparison Overview

Pacific Science Center

VS

RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center)

Pacific Science Center

200 Sue Bird Court N., None, Seattle, WA, US, 98109
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Born in the spirit of innovation at the 1962 World’s Fair in Seattle, the Pacific Science Center (PacSci) has ignited curiosity for more than 60 years. Since its founding as the nation’s first science and technology center, PacSci has worked to expand access to science, serve as a vital resource for educators, and fuel discovery and experimentation as a vibrant community laboratory. PacSci is an independent, not-for-profit institution that serves nearly 1 million people in the Pacific Northwest and beyond each year.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 230
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center)

657 East Ave, Rochester, NY, 14607, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The RMSC includes the RMSC Museum & Science Center, the RMSC Strasenburgh Planetarium, and the RMSC Cumming Nature Center. Offering experiences at the Museum & Science Center with more than 200 interactive exhibits, Planetarium with a 65-foot dome and Nature Center on 900 acres, the RMSC stimulates community interest in exploration. In addition, the more than 1.2 million RMSC collection items tell the story of Rochester’s past including its rich history of innovation and invention. RMSC receives major funding from Monroe County, where it is one of the top three most visited attractions serving children and families. For more information about RMSC, visit www.rmsc.org.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 166
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-science-center.jpeg
Pacific Science Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rochester-museum-&-science-center.jpeg
RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pacific Science Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pacific Science Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) in 2025.

Incident History — Pacific Science Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pacific Science Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-science-center.jpeg
Pacific Science Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rochester-museum-&-science-center.jpeg
RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pacific Science Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Pacific Science Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company has not reported any.

In the current year, RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company and Pacific Science Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company nor Pacific Science Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Pacific Science Center company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company nor Pacific Science Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pacific Science Center company nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pacific Science Center nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pacific Science Center company nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pacific Science Center company employs more people globally than RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Pacific Science Center nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pacific Science Center nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pacific Science Center nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pacific Science Center nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pacific Science Center nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pacific Science Center nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X