Comparison Overview

Pacific Science Center

VS

Madison-Morgan Cultural Center

Pacific Science Center

200 Sue Bird Court N., Seattle, 98109, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://pacificsciencecenter.org/

Born in the spirit of innovation at the 1962 World’s Fair in Seattle, the Pacific Science Center (PacSci) has ignited curiosity for more than 60 years. Since its founding as the nation’s first science and technology center, PacSci has worked to expand access to science, serve as a vital resource for educators, and fuel discovery and experimentation as a vibrant community laboratory. PacSci is an independent, not-for-profit institution that serves nearly 1 million people in the Pacific Northwest and beyond each year.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 213
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Madison-Morgan Cultural Center

None
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mmcc-arts.org/

The Madison-Morgan Cultural Center is a multi-disciplinary non-profit institution that endeavors to enrich the lives of the residents of its immediate community and the broader region by presenting high-quality programming and educational opportunities in the fields of visual and performing arts, history, and other humanities. MMCC will preserve and interpret its historic buildings and will cooperate with other organizations that have mission-compatible goals.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-science-center.jpeg
Pacific Science Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/madison-morgan-cultural-center.jpeg
Madison-Morgan Cultural Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pacific Science Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Madison-Morgan Cultural Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pacific Science Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Madison-Morgan Cultural Center in 2026.

Incident History — Pacific Science Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pacific Science Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Madison-Morgan Cultural Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Madison-Morgan Cultural Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-science-center.jpeg
Pacific Science Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/madison-morgan-cultural-center.jpeg
Madison-Morgan Cultural Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Madison-Morgan Cultural Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pacific Science Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Pacific Science Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Madison-Morgan Cultural Center company has not reported any.

In the current year, Madison-Morgan Cultural Center company and Pacific Science Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Madison-Morgan Cultural Center company nor Pacific Science Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Pacific Science Center company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Madison-Morgan Cultural Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Madison-Morgan Cultural Center company nor Pacific Science Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pacific Science Center company nor Madison-Morgan Cultural Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pacific Science Center nor Madison-Morgan Cultural Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pacific Science Center company nor Madison-Morgan Cultural Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pacific Science Center company employs more people globally than Madison-Morgan Cultural Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Pacific Science Center nor Madison-Morgan Cultural Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pacific Science Center nor Madison-Morgan Cultural Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pacific Science Center nor Madison-Morgan Cultural Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pacific Science Center nor Madison-Morgan Cultural Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pacific Science Center nor Madison-Morgan Cultural Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pacific Science Center nor Madison-Morgan Cultural Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References