Comparison Overview

PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD

VS

Martin Printing Company, Inc.

PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD

2 LUCCA RD, WYONG, NSW 2259, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-13

We provide the highest quality self-adhesive labels for all manner of industries. Whether it be food products, animal health, agricultural chemicals or craft brewing, Pacific Labels has the technology, the material options, the market knowledge and the passion to assist in giving your product the edge and eye catching finish that it deserves.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Martin Printing Company, Inc.

1765 POWDERSVILLE RD, Easley, South Carolina, 29642, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Martin Printing Company is an award-winning leader in the production of publications, direct mail, and custom marketing collateral. Serving clients nationwide, Martin Printing has the tools and expertise needed to deliver a quality product, quickly, and efficiently. Our knowledgeable team takes pride in helping clients differentiate themselves to make their message resonate with recipients for maximum ROI. Our equipment mix allows customers to realize the most economical solutions offered in the industry today.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-labels-pty-ltd.jpeg
PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/martin-printing-company-inc-.jpeg
Martin Printing Company, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Martin Printing Company, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Martin Printing Company, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Martin Printing Company, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Martin Printing Company, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-labels-pty-ltd.jpeg
PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/martin-printing-company-inc-.jpeg
Martin Printing Company, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Martin Printing Company, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Martin Printing Company, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company.

In the current year, Martin Printing Company, Inc. company and PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Martin Printing Company, Inc. company nor PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Martin Printing Company, Inc. company nor PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Martin Printing Company, Inc. company nor PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company nor Martin Printing Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD nor Martin Printing Company, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company nor Martin Printing Company, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Martin Printing Company, Inc. company employs more people globally than PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD nor Martin Printing Company, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD nor Martin Printing Company, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD nor Martin Printing Company, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD nor Martin Printing Company, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD nor Martin Printing Company, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD nor Martin Printing Company, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N