Comparison Overview

Pablo Center at the Confluence

VS

San Francisco Symphony

Pablo Center at the Confluence

128 Graham Ave, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, 54701, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Pablo Center at the Confluence is located in downtown Eau Claire, Wisconsin and will include a 1,200‐seat theatre and a flexible 400-seat theatre, rehearsal, dance and community rooms; visual arts studio and galleries, labs for sound and lighting, set and exhibit design, recording arts, multimedia production and costume design; a scene shop equipped to support the maker space and vocational training initiatives; administrative offices for management, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire faculty and Visit Eau Claire staff. The Pablo Center at the Confluence offers the community a facility capable of providing transformative training, learning and creative opportunities. Pablo Center at the Confluence will operate in support of a mission that is focused on augmenting and developing regional education opportunities in the performing, visual and literary arts for people of all ages and backgrounds.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

San Francisco Symphony

201 Van Ness Avenue, None, San Francisco, California, US, 94102
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 700 and 749

Founded in 1911, the San Francisco Symphony is one of the most adventurous and innovative arts institutions in the United States. Celebrated for its artistic excellence, creative performance concepts, award-winning recordings, and standard-setting education programs, the Symphony continues to shape the future of orchestral music, making a lasting impact on the cultural fabric of San Francisco and the world.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 346
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pablo-center-at-the-confluence.jpeg
Pablo Center at the Confluence
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-francisco-symphony.jpeg
San Francisco Symphony
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pablo Center at the Confluence
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
San Francisco Symphony
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pablo Center at the Confluence in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for San Francisco Symphony in 2025.

Incident History — Pablo Center at the Confluence (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pablo Center at the Confluence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — San Francisco Symphony (X = Date, Y = Severity)

San Francisco Symphony cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pablo-center-at-the-confluence.jpeg
Pablo Center at the Confluence
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-francisco-symphony.jpeg
San Francisco Symphony
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Pablo Center at the Confluence company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to San Francisco Symphony company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

San Francisco Symphony company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Pablo Center at the Confluence company has not reported any.

In the current year, San Francisco Symphony company and Pablo Center at the Confluence company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither San Francisco Symphony company nor Pablo Center at the Confluence company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

San Francisco Symphony company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Pablo Center at the Confluence company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither San Francisco Symphony company nor Pablo Center at the Confluence company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pablo Center at the Confluence company nor San Francisco Symphony company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pablo Center at the Confluence nor San Francisco Symphony holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pablo Center at the Confluence company nor San Francisco Symphony company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

San Francisco Symphony company employs more people globally than Pablo Center at the Confluence company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Pablo Center at the Confluence nor San Francisco Symphony holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pablo Center at the Confluence nor San Francisco Symphony holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pablo Center at the Confluence nor San Francisco Symphony holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pablo Center at the Confluence nor San Francisco Symphony holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pablo Center at the Confluence nor San Francisco Symphony holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pablo Center at the Confluence nor San Francisco Symphony holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N