Comparison Overview

OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project

VS

KLEAN Treatment Centers

OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project

Suite J, Kidlington, OX5 2DL, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Oxford Parent-Infant Project (OXPIP) is a charity which: • delivers specialist parent-infant psychotherapy to parents and infants in Oxfordshire, who need some help to form a secure attachment. We work with parents and infants from conception up to the age of two • provides national and international specialist psychodynamic parent-infant therapy training • supports awareness raising and policy change, regarding the importance of parent and infant relationships and mental health, locally and across the UK For more information please visit our website or get in touch!

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KLEAN Treatment Centers

9000 Sunset Blvd, West Hollywood, CA, 90069, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

KLEAN Treatment Centers is a collection of treatment facilities along the West Coast, with residential treatment locations in Long Beach, WA, West Hollywood, CA, and La Pine, OR, and outpatient treatment in West Hollywood, CA, Portland, OR and Astoria, OR and Bend, OR. KLEAN West Hollywood and La Pine admit dually diagnosed clients and those suffering from alcohol and drug addiction. Services offered are detox, residential treatment, outpatient therapy and a robust alumni and aftercare program. KLEAN Long Beach is a premier, 50-bed, gender-specific residential treatment center located in Long Beach, Washington. Treatment services include detox, residential treatment, outpatient therapy, aftercare and alumni programs. KLEAN Treatment Centers also has outpatient treatment facilities in West Hollywood, Ca, Astoria, OR, Bend, OR and Portland, OR.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oxpip---the-oxford-parent-infant-project.jpeg
OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/klean-centers.jpeg
KLEAN Treatment Centers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KLEAN Treatment Centers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KLEAN Treatment Centers in 2026.

Incident History — OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KLEAN Treatment Centers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KLEAN Treatment Centers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oxpip---the-oxford-parent-infant-project.jpeg
OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/klean-centers.jpeg
KLEAN Treatment Centers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

KLEAN Treatment Centers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, KLEAN Treatment Centers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project company.

In the current year, KLEAN Treatment Centers company and OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KLEAN Treatment Centers company nor OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KLEAN Treatment Centers company nor OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KLEAN Treatment Centers company nor OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project company nor KLEAN Treatment Centers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project nor KLEAN Treatment Centers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project company nor KLEAN Treatment Centers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

KLEAN Treatment Centers company employs more people globally than OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project nor KLEAN Treatment Centers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project nor KLEAN Treatment Centers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project nor KLEAN Treatment Centers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project nor KLEAN Treatment Centers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project nor KLEAN Treatment Centers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OXPIP - The Oxford Parent Infant Project nor KLEAN Treatment Centers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N