Comparison Overview

Our USA Magazine

VS

Harvard Law Review

Our USA Magazine

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21

A magazine that celebrates this diverse country and the magnanimous people who live here, from a very unique perspective - your own! It gives you, the reader, the opportunity to tell us your stories, display your photos, share your ideas and interests and really talk with one another. Our USA magazine will allow an intimate glimpse into each others lives through the shared experiences of laughter, tears and joy, revealing the warmth and strength of all its people. Each issue will display the natural beauty of this magnificent land as seen through the eyes of its readers, reflecting the reasons why we are so proud to call ourselves American!

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Harvard Law Review

1511 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

The Harvard Law Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. The Review comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2,500 pages per volume. The organization is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions and, together with a professional business staff of three, carry out day-to-day operations.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Our USA Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harvard-law-review.jpeg
Harvard Law Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Our USA Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Harvard Law Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Our USA Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harvard Law Review in 2025.

Incident History — Our USA Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Our USA Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Harvard Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harvard Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Our USA Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harvard-law-review.jpeg
Harvard Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Our USA Magazine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Harvard Law Review company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Harvard Law Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Our USA Magazine company.

In the current year, Harvard Law Review company and Our USA Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Harvard Law Review company nor Our USA Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Harvard Law Review company nor Our USA Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Harvard Law Review company nor Our USA Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Our USA Magazine company nor Harvard Law Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Our USA Magazine nor Harvard Law Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Our USA Magazine company nor Harvard Law Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Harvard Law Review company employs more people globally than Our USA Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Our USA Magazine nor Harvard Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Our USA Magazine nor Harvard Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Our USA Magazine nor Harvard Law Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Our USA Magazine nor Harvard Law Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Our USA Magazine nor Harvard Law Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Our USA Magazine nor Harvard Law Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.