Comparison Overview

Oxford University Press

VS

Spirit Publishing

Oxford University Press

Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, undefined, OX2 6DP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Part of the University of Oxford. Established in the earliest days of printing, we’ve been home to the inquisitive, the passionate, and the ambitious for the last 500 years. Our mission is clear – to create the highest quality research and education resources and make them available worldwide. From a child reading their first words to a researcher expanding the frontiers of their field, the possibilities are endless with Oxford University Press.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 7,988
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Spirit Publishing

Potts Point, Sydney, 2011, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Spirit Publishing is a Greeting Card company and the core products are greeting cards for all occasions. Overtime additional stationery and gift have been added to the range. Spirit believes in creating products that bring joy, humour and beauty to its customers. 'Spirit'​ as a concept embodies many ideas: the spirit of fun, the spirit of creativity, the spirit of exploring the world around us and the spirit of being free to express our true selves. Spirit offers products that are the best in their category. Whether you are looking for a really REALLY funny card, a gorgeous hand crafted card, or a photographic or inspirational card, products that help express inner feelings and thoughts.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oup.jpeg
Oxford University Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spirit-publishing.jpeg
Spirit Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Oxford University Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Spirit Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oxford University Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spirit Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — Oxford University Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oxford University Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Spirit Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spirit Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oup.jpeg
Oxford University Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spirit-publishing.jpeg
Spirit Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Spirit Publishing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oxford University Press company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Spirit Publishing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Oxford University Press company.

In the current year, Spirit Publishing company and Oxford University Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Spirit Publishing company nor Oxford University Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Spirit Publishing company nor Oxford University Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Spirit Publishing company nor Oxford University Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Oxford University Press company nor Spirit Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Oxford University Press nor Spirit Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Oxford University Press company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Spirit Publishing company.

Oxford University Press company employs more people globally than Spirit Publishing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Oxford University Press nor Spirit Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Oxford University Press nor Spirit Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Oxford University Press nor Spirit Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Oxford University Press nor Spirit Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Oxford University Press nor Spirit Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Oxford University Press nor Spirit Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.