Comparison Overview

OTTO for Business

VS

Bake Me A Wish!

OTTO for Business

Werner-Otto-Straße, Hamburg, 22179, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-25
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://advertising.otto.de

OTTO Advertising sorgt mit datenbasierten Werbelösungen für noch mehr Erfolg auf unserer Plattform. Mit OTTO Market binden wir Verkäufer an unsere Plattform an und gestalten für unsere Partner das Verkaufen auf OTTO so einfach und bequem wie möglich. Wir wollen gemeinsam mit Ihnen wachsen und machen uns Ihren Erfolg zur Aufgabe. Daher profitieren Sie von unseren vielfältigen Services und holen ganz einfach mehr aus Ihrer Partnerschaft mit OTTO heraus. Impressum: https://www.otto.de/unternehmen/de/impressum/index.php

NAICS: 4541
NAICS Definition: Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Bake Me A Wish!

303 5th Ave, New York, New York, 10016, US
Last Update: 2025-12-30
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bakemeawish.com

Bake Me A Wish! began in 2005 as the premiere nationwide service for gourmet birthday cake delivery. Our cakes are made with only the finest, freshest ingredients by our award-winning New York bakeries. Over the past decade, we've grown to offer more and more of the finest bakery gifts available including gourmet cookies, brownies, cupcakes, pies and quiches. There is no better way to celebrate a special occasion than to send a little indulgence from someone who cares. Our Guarantee: On-Time Delivery and a Quality Gift

NAICS: 454
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/otto-for-business.jpeg
OTTO for Business
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bake-me-a-wish-.jpeg
Bake Me A Wish!
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OTTO for Business
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bake Me A Wish!
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OTTO for Business in 2025.

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bake Me A Wish! in 2025.

Incident History — OTTO for Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OTTO for Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bake Me A Wish! (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bake Me A Wish! cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/otto-for-business.jpeg
OTTO for Business
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bake-me-a-wish-.jpeg
Bake Me A Wish!
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

OTTO for Business company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bake Me A Wish! company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bake Me A Wish! company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to OTTO for Business company.

In the current year, Bake Me A Wish! company and OTTO for Business company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bake Me A Wish! company nor OTTO for Business company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bake Me A Wish! company nor OTTO for Business company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bake Me A Wish! company nor OTTO for Business company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither OTTO for Business company nor Bake Me A Wish! company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither OTTO for Business nor Bake Me A Wish! holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither OTTO for Business company nor Bake Me A Wish! company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither OTTO for Business nor Bake Me A Wish! holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OTTO for Business nor Bake Me A Wish! holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OTTO for Business nor Bake Me A Wish! holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OTTO for Business nor Bake Me A Wish! holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OTTO for Business nor Bake Me A Wish! holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OTTO for Business nor Bake Me A Wish! holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. Affected is an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPUserSetting. Performing manipulation of the argument delno results in stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. This impacts an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPServer. Such manipulation of the argument ip1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in omec-project UPF up to 2.1.3-dev. This affects the function handleSessionEstablishmentRequest of the file /pfcpiface/pfcpiface/messages_session.go of the component PFCP Session Establishment Request Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in floooh sokol up to 16cbcc864012898793cd2bc57f802499a264ea40. The impacted element is the function _sg_pipeline_desc_defaults in the library sokol_gfx.h. The manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is identified as 5d11344150973f15e16d3ec4ee7550a73fb995e0. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in PbootCMS up to 3.2.12. The affected element is the function get_user_ip of the file core/function/handle.php of the component Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Forwarded-For leads to use of less trusted source. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References