Comparison Overview

Ottawa Salus

VS

Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc.

Ottawa Salus

2000 Scott St, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Z 6T2, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

For more than 45 years, Salus has been providing supportive housing and mental health services to adults living in the Ottawa area with severe mental illness, both in Salus housing and within the greater community. Our core conviction is that a home is a critical step to a healthy and rewarding life. Salus owns and operates 14 buildings in Ottawa. Our supportive housing model of care is successful in making housing a reality for so many people because of the crucial mental health support that frontline staff provide to clients. Our mental health programs and services work collaboratively, using an integrated service model to meet the unique needs of each client. Our integrated services: • Case Management Services • Community Development Services • Housing Coordination Services • Transitional Rehabilitation Programs • Occupational Therapy Services • Recreation and Wellness Services Salus offers both transitional and permanent affordable housing opportunities in a variety of settings, as well as property management including 24/7 after hours services.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc.

525 East 15th Street, None, Panama City, FL, US, 32405
Last Update: 2026-01-12
Between 700 and 749

Life Management Center provides comprehensive behavioral and mental health care in Bay, Calhoun, Gulf, Holmes, Jackson, and Washington Counties, Florida. We offer objective, professional help with personal problems ranging from family life adjustment difficulties to stress reactions, substance abuse and mental illness. Our staff is multi-disciplinary and includes psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, psychotherapists, counselors and nurses. Life Management Center serves over 12,000 individuals and families each year. The Center is governed by a volunteer Board of Directors charged with the responsibility of ensuring quality of care, effective management, and responsiveness to community needs. We have been in operation since 1954.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 179
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ottawa-salus.jpeg
Ottawa Salus
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifemanagementcenter.jpeg
Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ottawa Salus
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ottawa Salus in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — Ottawa Salus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ottawa Salus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ottawa-salus.jpeg
Ottawa Salus
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifemanagementcenter.jpeg
Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Ottawa Salus company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Ottawa Salus company has not reported any.

In the current year, Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. company and Ottawa Salus company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. company nor Ottawa Salus company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Ottawa Salus company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. company nor Ottawa Salus company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ottawa Salus company nor Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ottawa Salus nor Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ottawa Salus company nor Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. company employs more people globally than Ottawa Salus company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Ottawa Salus nor Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ottawa Salus nor Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ottawa Salus nor Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ottawa Salus nor Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ottawa Salus nor Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ottawa Salus nor Life Management Center of NW Florida, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N