Comparison Overview

Otkritie

VS

New York Life Insurance Company

Otkritie

2 bld 4 Letnikovskaya St. Moscow, Moscow 115114, RU
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

OTKRITIE Financial Corporation is one of the most dynamic and fastest growing investment banks in Russia. The company has been operating on the stock market as a broker, asset manager, financial advisor and investment bank since 1995. OTKRITIE FC has become a trusted partner for many Russian and international, both individual and institutional investors.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

New York Life Insurance Company

51 Madison Avenue, New York, New York, US, 10010
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 700 and 749

For over 175 years, we've been helping people put love into action. As a mutual company we hold ourselves to the highest standards of transparency, objectivity, and integrity. We’re committed to improving local communities through a culture of giving and volunteerism, supported by our own New York Life Foundation. Join a company that values development, career growth, collaboration, innovation, and diversity & inclusion. Through various resources and programs, you can grow your career while developing personally and professionally. We invite you to bring your talents here, so we can continue the good to help families and businesses “Be Good at Life.” New York Life is an Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/Disability/Veteran/Sexual Orientation/Gender Identity Read our disclaimers: http://nyl.co/socialmedia

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 40,532
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/otkritie.jpeg
Otkritie
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newyorklife.jpeg
New York Life Insurance Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Otkritie
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
New York Life Insurance Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Otkritie in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New York Life Insurance Company in 2025.

Incident History — Otkritie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Otkritie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — New York Life Insurance Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New York Life Insurance Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/otkritie.jpeg
Otkritie
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newyorklife.jpeg
New York Life Insurance Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Otkritie company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to New York Life Insurance Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

New York Life Insurance Company company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Otkritie company has not reported any.

In the current year, New York Life Insurance Company company and Otkritie company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither New York Life Insurance Company company nor Otkritie company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

New York Life Insurance Company company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Otkritie company has not reported such incidents publicly.

New York Life Insurance Company company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Otkritie company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Otkritie company nor New York Life Insurance Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Otkritie nor New York Life Insurance Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

New York Life Insurance Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Otkritie company.

New York Life Insurance Company company employs more people globally than Otkritie company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Otkritie nor New York Life Insurance Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Otkritie nor New York Life Insurance Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Otkritie nor New York Life Insurance Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Otkritie nor New York Life Insurance Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Otkritie nor New York Life Insurance Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Otkritie nor New York Life Insurance Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H