Comparison Overview

Oslo Museum

VS

Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac

Oslo Museum

Frognerveien 67, Oslo, 0257, NO
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://oslomuseum.no

Stiftelsen Oslo Museum er byens eget museum, og bidrar til kunnskap om og forankring i Oslo-samfunnet. Museet forvalter, formidler og forsker i Oslos historie, teaterhistorie og nyere innvandringshistorie. Museet har en aktiv formidlingsprofil og tilhold på flere steder i Oslo; Bymuseet og Teatermuseet i Frognerparken, Interkulturelt Museum på Grønland og Arbeidermuseet på Sagene. Oslo Museum ble i 2019 kåret til «Årets museum» av Norges Museumsforbund, med begrunnelse i museets mangfoldsprofil og nyskapende formidlings- og utstillingsarbeid. Museet forvalter en av landets største fotosamlinger, har en stor samling av malerier og Oslo-portretter, og en kulturhistorisk samling som også inkluderer intervjumateriale.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac

37 quai Branly, Paris, 75007, FR
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
https://www.quaibranly.fr/

In the heart of Paris's museum land, neighbouring the Louvre and the Musée d’Orsay, a few minutes from the Grand and Petit Palais, the Palais de Tokyo and the Musée d’art moderne de la Ville de Paris, the Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac has an exceptional location on the banks of the River Seine, at the foot of the Eiffel Tower. The arts of Africa, Oceania, Asia, and the Americas now form part of the historical and artistic grand tour of the capital. The Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac is an innovative cultural institution - museum, educational and research centre, and public living space all in one. Built on one of the last available sites in the heart of Paris, the architectural design of this original project is the work of Jean Nouvel.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 367
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oslo-museum.jpeg
Oslo Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/musee-du-quai-branly.jpeg
Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Oslo Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oslo Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac in 2026.

Incident History — Oslo Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oslo Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oslo-museum.jpeg
Oslo Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/musee-du-quai-branly.jpeg
Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oslo Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Oslo Museum company.

In the current year, Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac company and Oslo Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac company nor Oslo Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac company nor Oslo Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac company nor Oslo Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Oslo Museum company nor Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Oslo Museum company nor Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac company employs more people globally than Oslo Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Musée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References