Comparison Overview

Oslo Museum

VS

Michener Art Museum

Oslo Museum

Frognerveien 67, Oslo, 0257, NO
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://oslomuseum.no

Stiftelsen Oslo Museum er byens eget museum, og bidrar til kunnskap om og forankring i Oslo-samfunnet. Museet forvalter, formidler og forsker i Oslos historie, teaterhistorie og nyere innvandringshistorie. Museet har en aktiv formidlingsprofil og tilhold på flere steder i Oslo; Bymuseet og Teatermuseet i Frognerparken, Interkulturelt Museum på Grønland og Arbeidermuseet på Sagene. Oslo Museum ble i 2019 kåret til «Årets museum» av Norges Museumsforbund, med begrunnelse i museets mangfoldsprofil og nyskapende formidlings- og utstillingsarbeid. Museet forvalter en av landets største fotosamlinger, har en stor samling av malerier og Oslo-portretter, og en kulturhistorisk samling som også inkluderer intervjumateriale.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Michener Art Museum

138 S Pine St, Doylestown, Pennsylvania 18901, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.michenerartmuseum.org

Built on the property that once housed the old Bucks County Jail, the James A. Michener Art Museum’s history is a part of a large and lasting legacy that spans over 130 years and is deep-rooted in the Doylestown community. With its ties to the notorious jail and its metamorphosis into what is now Bucks County’s premier cultural institution and America’s hub for Pennsylvania Impressionism, the Michener represents the transformative power art has on individuals and communities alike. For three decades, the Michener has stood as a pillar in the arts community locally, regionally, and nationally, attracting more than 100,000 guests each year and hosting critically-acclaimed exhibitions. Committed to preserving, interpreting, and exhibiting the art and cultural heritage of the “Genius Belt” known as Bucks County, the Michener celebrates its 30th anniversary with a continued promise to inspire creativity, to foster a welcoming environment for the curious of all ages, and to deliver high-quality art and programming to the Doylestown community and beyond.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oslo-museum.jpeg
Oslo Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/james-a-michener-art-museum.jpeg
Michener Art Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Oslo Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Michener Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oslo Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Michener Art Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Oslo Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oslo Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Michener Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Michener Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oslo-museum.jpeg
Oslo Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/james-a-michener-art-museum.jpeg
Michener Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Oslo Museum company and Michener Art Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Michener Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Oslo Museum company.

In the current year, Michener Art Museum company and Oslo Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Michener Art Museum company nor Oslo Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Michener Art Museum company nor Oslo Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Michener Art Museum company nor Oslo Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Oslo Museum company nor Michener Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Michener Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Oslo Museum company nor Michener Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Michener Art Museum company employs more people globally than Oslo Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Michener Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Michener Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Michener Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Michener Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Michener Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Oslo Museum nor Michener Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References