Comparison Overview

OSGeo

VS

Thoughtworks

OSGeo

9450 SW Gemini Dr, #42523, Beaverton, Oregon, US, 97008
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

The Open Source Geospatial Foundation (OSGeo) is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to foster global adoption of open geospatial technology by being an inclusive software foundation devoted to an open philosophy and participatory community driven development. The foundation provides financial, organizational and legal support to the broader open source geospatial community. It also serves as an independent legal entity to which community members can contribute code, funding and other resources, secure in the knowledge that their contributions will be maintained for public benefit. OSGeo also serves as an outreach and advocacy organization for the open source geospatial community, and provides a common forum and shared infrastructure for improving cross-project collaboration. The foundation’s projects are all freely available and useable under an Open Source Initiative certified open source license. OSGeo has US 501(c)(4) legal status as a not-for-profit organization.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Thoughtworks

200 E Randolph St, Chicago, IL, 60601-6501, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Thoughtworks is a pioneering global technology consultancy, leading the charge in custom software development and technology innovation. We empower ambitious businesses to thrive in a constantly evolving world. We integrate the best of strategy, design, and software engineering to provide our clients with the foundations they need to excel. Our 30+ years of hands-on experience enables us to help our clients navigate change effectively, harness the power of data and AI to unlock new sources of value, and create adaptable technology platforms that align seamlessly with their business objectives. We are a team of 10,500 talented Thoughtworkers across 19 countries. Here, computer science grads come together with seasoned technologists, self-taught developers, midlife career changers and more to learn from and challenge each other. Career journeys flourish with the strength of our cultivation culture, which has won awards around the world.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 11,241
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/osgeo.jpeg
OSGeo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thoughtworks.jpeg
Thoughtworks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OSGeo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Thoughtworks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OSGeo in 2025.

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thoughtworks in 2025.

Incident History — OSGeo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OSGeo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Thoughtworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thoughtworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/osgeo.jpeg
OSGeo
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of CVE-2024-36401
Motivation: Cyberespionage, Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thoughtworks.jpeg
Thoughtworks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Thoughtworks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OSGeo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

OSGeo company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Thoughtworks company has not reported any.

In the current year, Thoughtworks company and OSGeo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Thoughtworks company nor OSGeo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Thoughtworks company nor OSGeo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Thoughtworks company nor OSGeo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

OSGeo company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Thoughtworks company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither OSGeo nor Thoughtworks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Thoughtworks company and OSGeo company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Thoughtworks company employs more people globally than OSGeo company, reflecting its scale as a Information Technology & Services.

Neither OSGeo nor Thoughtworks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OSGeo nor Thoughtworks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OSGeo nor Thoughtworks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OSGeo nor Thoughtworks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OSGeo nor Thoughtworks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OSGeo nor Thoughtworks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N