Comparison Overview

OSF HealthCare

VS

Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist

OSF HealthCare

124 SW Adams St, Peoria, 61602, US
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 650 and 699

OSF HealthCare is an integrated health system founded by The Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis. Headquartered in Peoria, Illinois, OSF HealthCare has 17 hospitals – 11 acute care, five critical access and one continuing care – with 2,305 licensed beds throughout Illinois and Michigan. OSF employs more than 26,000 Mission Partners across 171 locations; has two colleges of nursing; operates OSF Home Care Services, an extensive network of home health and hospice services; owns Pointcore, Inc., comprised of health care-related businesses; OSF HealthCare Foundation, the philanthropic arm for the organization; and OSF Ventures, which provides investment capital for promising health care innovation startups. In 2020, OSF OnCall was established as a digital health operating unit and includes a hospital-at-home program. OSF OnCall delivers care and services when, where and how patients prefer to receive them. OSF HealthCare has been recognized by Fortune as one of the most innovative companies in the country. OSF consistently earns recognition for showing dedication to the well-being of its Mission Partners: •America’s Best-in-State Employers | Forbes Magazine | 2018-2025 •150 Top Places to Work in Healthcare | Becker’s Healthcare | 2019, 2022-2025 •Best Employers for Women | Forbes Magazine | 2020 OSF HealthCare is an Equal Opportunity Employer (EOE). By engaging with this page, you acknowledge and agree to follow our social media terms of use, which you can find here: https://www.osfhealthcare.org/patients-visitors/terms-conditions/social-terms

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 12,123
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist

Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, US, 27157
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist is a nationally recognized academic medical center and health system based in Winston-Salem, NC, part of Advocate Health, the third-largest nonprofit health system in the United States. Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist’s two main components are an integrated clinical system – anchored by Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, an 885-bed tertiary-care hospital in Winston-Salem – that includes Brenner Children’s Hospital, five community hospitals, more than 300 primary and specialty care locations and more than 2,700 physicians; and Wake Forest University School of Medicine, a recognized leader in experiential medical education and groundbreaking research. Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist and Wake Forest University School of Medicine are the academic core of Advocate Health. Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist employs more than 20,000 teammates, part of Advocate Health’s 150,000 teammates. Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist provided a record-setting $611.2 million in community benefits during the 2021 fiscal year, which includes unreimbursed care, charity care, education and research, and community health improvement.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,512
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/osf-healthcare.jpeg
OSF HealthCare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atrium-health-wake-forest-baptist.jpeg
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OSF HealthCare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OSF HealthCare in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist in 2026.

Incident History — OSF HealthCare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OSF HealthCare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/osf-healthcare.jpeg
OSF HealthCare
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized third-party access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2021
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atrium-health-wake-forest-baptist.jpeg
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OSF HealthCare company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

OSF HealthCare company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist company has not reported any.

In the current year, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist company and OSF HealthCare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

OSF HealthCare company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist company has not reported such incidents publicly.

OSF HealthCare company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist company nor OSF HealthCare company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither OSF HealthCare company nor Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither OSF HealthCare nor Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

OSF HealthCare company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist company.

OSF HealthCare company employs more people globally than Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither OSF HealthCare nor Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OSF HealthCare nor Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OSF HealthCare nor Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OSF HealthCare nor Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OSF HealthCare nor Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OSF HealthCare nor Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.