Comparison Overview

Osbornes Law

VS

CGM Hampshire Solicitors

Osbornes Law

9 Pratt Street, London, undefined, NW1 0AE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Osbornes Law was established in Camden, North London in 1973. The firm specialises in Family Law (including international adoption and child abduction), Personal Injury Claims, Catastrophic Injury Claims and rehabilitation, Residential Conveyancing, Commercial Property, Property Litigation, Social Welfare and Wills, Probate, Disputed Estates. and Notary Services. Osbornes Law is led by 18 highly experienced partners and comprises a total of 110 lawyers and staff with a reputation for excellence and a strong commitment to our clients - This is why the firm keeps on expanding and clients keep coming back. Independent legal directories 'Chambers & Partners'​ and 'The Legal 500'​ recognise and recommend Osbornes Law as leaders in their fields, ranking the firm as a leader in a number of practice areas including family, children and housing. Individual solicitors have also been noted by these directories as being “leading individuals"​ in the area of law they practice. Our recommended lawyers include Mark Freedman, Stuart Kightley, Jan Atkinson, Lisa Pepper, Ben Posford, Stephanie Prior, Naomi Angell, Simone McGrath, Shilpa Mathuradas and William Ford.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 188
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CGM Hampshire Solicitors

Enterprise House, Southampton , England, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

"On Your Side"​ The family firm of McCarrahers was established before the Second World War. This became Christopher Green McCarrahers following a merger between McCarrahers and Christopher Green & Partners in April 2000. Despite the recent harsh economic climate the firm has continued to expand, with Chartahouse Licensed Conveyancers in Southampton joining us in 2008 and Blatch & Co Solicitors in 2011.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/osbornes-solicitors-llp.jpeg
Osbornes Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cgm-solicitors.jpeg
CGM Hampshire Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Osbornes Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CGM Hampshire Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Osbornes Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CGM Hampshire Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — Osbornes Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Osbornes Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CGM Hampshire Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CGM Hampshire Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/osbornes-solicitors-llp.jpeg
Osbornes Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cgm-solicitors.jpeg
CGM Hampshire Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Osbornes Law company and CGM Hampshire Solicitors company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, CGM Hampshire Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Osbornes Law company.

In the current year, CGM Hampshire Solicitors company and Osbornes Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CGM Hampshire Solicitors company nor Osbornes Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CGM Hampshire Solicitors company nor Osbornes Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CGM Hampshire Solicitors company nor Osbornes Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Osbornes Law company nor CGM Hampshire Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Osbornes Law nor CGM Hampshire Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Osbornes Law company nor CGM Hampshire Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Osbornes Law company employs more people globally than CGM Hampshire Solicitors company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Osbornes Law nor CGM Hampshire Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Osbornes Law nor CGM Hampshire Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Osbornes Law nor CGM Hampshire Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Osbornes Law nor CGM Hampshire Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Osbornes Law nor CGM Hampshire Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Osbornes Law nor CGM Hampshire Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X