Comparison Overview

Orleans Public Defenders

VS

Prison Break Investigations

Orleans Public Defenders

2601 Tulane Ave., New Orleans, Louisiana, 70119, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The mission of the Orleans Public Defenders (OPD) aims to fight for our clients by providing excellent client-centered representation, reforming the system and partnering with the community. OPD provides holistic, community-based representation in New Orleans, representing thousands of people each year utilizing a client-centered defense model that puts the client first and takes a 360 degree approach to our advocacy and representation. We recognize our clients are unique individuals and work to address their needs both in the court and out. Our diverse staff includes adult and juvenile attorneys; social workers; client, youth and parent advocates; investigators, and administrators all working together for equal justice for our clients, their families, our community, and a better New Orleans. In short, we protect innocence, defend the constitution, demand justice, and hold power accountable.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 127
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Prison Break Investigations

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Criminal Defense Investigative Firm - Comprised of retired Law Enforcement Officers / Detectives. Prison Break Investigations has a Due Process Contract authorizing due process payments through the JAC (Florida Justice Administrative Commission). CASES THAT RESULTED IN NOT GUILTY OR CHARGES DROPPED State of Florida Vs. Simmons- 1st Degree Murder- Found Not Guilty by Jury. State of Florida Vs. Carmichael- Attempted Murder- Prosecutor Dropped/Abandoned prior to filing information due to obtaining cell phone records proving innocence. State of Florida Vs. Chapman- Aggravated Assault- Prosecutor dropped the case after obtaining evidence of innocence. State of Florida Vs. Leyva- Attempted Murder- Reduced to felony battery- probation sentence. State of Florida VS. Hart- 3rd Degree Murder- Nolle Prosequi by prosecutor before trial. State of Florida Vs. Gates- 1st Degree Murder- Charge pled to Manslaughter based on our investigative findings. State of Florida Vs. Answeeney - Armed Home Invasion, Armed Robbery - Found Not Guilty by Jury. State of Florida Vs. Henin - Aggravated Assault With a Motor Vehicle - Prosecutor dropped the case after obtaining evidence of innocence. State of Florida Vs. Flournoy - 1st Degree Murder- Found Not Guilty by Jury. State of Florida Vs. Reyes – Lewd or Lascivious Act on a Minor Under 12 Years Old (Five Counts) – Found Not Guilty by Jury.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orleans-public-defenders.jpeg
Orleans Public Defenders
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prison-break-investigations.jpeg
Prison Break Investigations
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Orleans Public Defenders
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Prison Break Investigations
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orleans Public Defenders in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prison Break Investigations in 2025.

Incident History — Orleans Public Defenders (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orleans Public Defenders cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Prison Break Investigations (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prison Break Investigations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orleans-public-defenders.jpeg
Orleans Public Defenders
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prison-break-investigations.jpeg
Prison Break Investigations
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Prison Break Investigations company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Orleans Public Defenders company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Prison Break Investigations company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Orleans Public Defenders company.

In the current year, Prison Break Investigations company and Orleans Public Defenders company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Prison Break Investigations company nor Orleans Public Defenders company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Prison Break Investigations company nor Orleans Public Defenders company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Prison Break Investigations company nor Orleans Public Defenders company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Orleans Public Defenders company nor Prison Break Investigations company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Orleans Public Defenders nor Prison Break Investigations holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Orleans Public Defenders company nor Prison Break Investigations company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Orleans Public Defenders company employs more people globally than Prison Break Investigations company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Orleans Public Defenders nor Prison Break Investigations holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Orleans Public Defenders nor Prison Break Investigations holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Orleans Public Defenders nor Prison Break Investigations holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Orleans Public Defenders nor Prison Break Investigations holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Orleans Public Defenders nor Prison Break Investigations holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Orleans Public Defenders nor Prison Break Investigations holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X