Comparison Overview

Orica

VS

Jindal Steel & Power Ltd.

Orica

1 Nicholson St, East Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Our story began in 1874, when we first supplied explosives to the Victorian goldfields in Australia. Since then, we have grown to become one of the world’s leading mining and infrastructure solutions providers. From the production and supply of explosives, blasting systems, mining chemicals and geotechnical monitoring to our cutting-edge digital solutions and comprehensive range of services, we sustainably mobilise the earth’s resources. With 150 years of expertise, our 14,000+ community of engineers, scientists, technologists, operators, business specialists and on-site crew support customers in surface and underground mines, quarry, construction, and oil and gas operations. Sustainability is integral to our operations. Our approach to sustainability begins with ensuring we operate our business responsibly, and by prioritising the safety of our people, customers, and communities. We are in a unique position to leverage our expertise in technology to create safer and more responsible solutions and deliver positive economic, social, and environmental contributions through our business activities.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 10,614
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jindal Steel & Power Ltd.

Jindal Centre, 12, Bhikaiji Cama Place, Delhi, New Delhi, IN, 110066
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Jindal Steel and Power Limited (JSPL) is one of India’s fastest growing and largest integrated steel manufacturers, significantly present in the steel, power, mining and infrastructure segment. Part of the US $ 18 billion OP Jindal Group this young, agile and responsive company's business operations span across Asia, Africa and Australia. Led by Mr Naveen Jindal, the youngest son of the legendary Shri O.P. Jindal, the company produces economical and efficient steel and power through backward and forward integration. From the widest flat products to a whole range of long products, JSPL today sports a product portfolio that caters to markets across the steel value chain. The company produces the world's longest (121-meter) rails and it is the first in the country to manufacture large-size parallel flange beams. An enterprising spirit and the ability to discern future trends have been the driving force behind the company's remarkable growth story. The organisation is wedded to ideals like innovation and technological leadership and provides employment opportunities to over 22,000 Indians and anchor a socio-economic ecosystem for over 100,000 families. JSPL has been rated as the second highest value creator in the world by the Boston Consulting Group, the 11th fastest growing company in India by Business World and has figured in the Forbes Asia list of Fab 50 companies. It has also been named among the Best Blue Chip companies and rated as the Highest Wealth Creator by the Dalal Street Journal. Dun & Bradstreet has ranked it 4th in its list of companies that generated the highest total income in the iron and steel sector. To know more visit http://www.jindalsteelpower.com/

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 17,724
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orica.jpeg
Orica
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jindal-steel-power-ltd-.jpeg
Jindal Steel & Power Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Orica
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jindal Steel & Power Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orica in 2025.

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History — Orica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orica.jpeg
Orica
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jindal-steel-power-ltd-.jpeg
Jindal Steel & Power Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Orica company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Orica company.

In the current year, Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. company and Orica company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. company nor Orica company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. company nor Orica company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. company nor Orica company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Orica company nor Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Orica nor Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Orica company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. company.

Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. company employs more people globally than Orica company, reflecting its scale as a Mining.

Neither Orica nor Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Orica nor Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Orica nor Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Orica nor Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Orica nor Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Orica nor Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H