Comparison Overview

Ordrupgaard

VS

SEE Science Center

Ordrupgaard

Vilvordevej 110, Charlottenlund, Hovedstaden, DK, 2920
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ordrupgaard.dk

Ordrupgaard er et museum for fransk impressionisme med kunstnere som Monet, Degas, Renoir og Gauguin. Dertil kommer en betydelig samling af dansk kunst koncentreret omkring Hammershøi og hans tid – samt skiftende særudstillinger. I parken finder du værker af internationale samtidskunstnere. Eller du kan besøge Finn Juhls verdensberømte hus. Bygninger af Zaha Hadid og Snøhetta understreger museets arkitektoniske profil og optræder som værker i deres egen ret. Ordrupgaard blev grundlagt af ægteparret Wilhelm og Henny Hansen som en privat kunstsamling. Museet holder fortsat til i stifterparrets herskabshjem, Ordrupgaard, der blev opført i 1918.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

SEE Science Center

200 Bedford St., None, Manchester, NH, US, 03101
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.see-sciencecenter.org

Founded by renowned inventor and entrepreneur Dean Kamen, the SEE Science Center was dedicated in April of 1986 and has been engaging visitors of all ages in the pursuit of science discovery ever since. Located in Manchester, NH SEE is a member of the Association of Science and Technology Centers and their passport program. The SEE Science Center is open Tuesday through Friday 10am to 4pm, and Saturday & Sunday 10am to 5pm. SEE offers a variety of experiences: -Hands-on exhibits covering topics such as: forces, light, sound electricity, simple machines and more. -Daily Demonstrations -The LEGO® Millyard Project on permanent display. -Science Gift Shop -Group programs including field trip tours, labs and LEGO® programs. -Outreach programs for schools, libraries and community groups -Programs for adults, kids and families -Summer Camps -Birthday Parties -Annual Family Membership program By applying creativity, determination and attention to science curricula, SEE has been able to achieve consumer satisfaction among children, parents and teachers. SEE has become the place in New Hampshire to experience hands-on science fun. SEE is an IRS designated 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ordrupgaard.jpeg
Ordrupgaard
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/see-science-center.jpeg
SEE Science Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ordrupgaard
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SEE Science Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ordrupgaard in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SEE Science Center in 2026.

Incident History — Ordrupgaard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ordrupgaard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SEE Science Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SEE Science Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ordrupgaard.jpeg
Ordrupgaard
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/see-science-center.jpeg
SEE Science Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Ordrupgaard company and SEE Science Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, SEE Science Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ordrupgaard company.

In the current year, SEE Science Center company and Ordrupgaard company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SEE Science Center company nor Ordrupgaard company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SEE Science Center company nor Ordrupgaard company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SEE Science Center company nor Ordrupgaard company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ordrupgaard company nor SEE Science Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ordrupgaard nor SEE Science Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ordrupgaard company nor SEE Science Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ordrupgaard company employs more people globally than SEE Science Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Ordrupgaard nor SEE Science Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ordrupgaard nor SEE Science Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ordrupgaard nor SEE Science Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ordrupgaard nor SEE Science Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ordrupgaard nor SEE Science Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ordrupgaard nor SEE Science Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References