Comparison Overview

OrangeSky LLC

VS

Salmon Creek Law Offices

OrangeSky LLC

201 1st Ave W, Albany, 97321, US
Last Update: 2025-11-30
Between 750 and 799

Partnering with corporate legal teams since 2010. We care a lot about your IP Portfolio, so you can shift focus to your brand strategies and client service. Our IP professionals provide specialized, value-add industry knowledge to everything we touch. We are not Attorneys. We work with in-house Attorneys and Para-professionals within corporate legal teams to help keep track of all of your data, documents and deadlines.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Salmon Creek Law Offices

1412 NE 134th St, Vancouver, WA, 98685, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Salmon Creek Law Offices, a three attorney law firm located in Vancouver,Washington, assists clients with their legal matters throughout Washington and Oregon. All of our experienced lawyers are licensed to practice law in Oregon and Washington. Our client centered approach to providing legal services starts with your first telephone contact. Rest assured you will be greeted by a helpful professional, not an answering machine or switchboard operator. Our legal professionals take the time to listen to you and your legal concerns. Our attorneys provide results oriented legal representation in a friendly and personable manner. When counseling our transactional clients, our preventative legal approach identifies and addresses potential legal concerns before they become lawsuits, protecting our clients and their businesses. In litigation, we are committed to achieving the best possible results for our clients using our aggressive but practical approach. Call a Vancouver, Washington Attorney at Salmon Creek Law Offices today.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orangesky-llc.jpeg
OrangeSky LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salmon-creek-law-offices.jpeg
Salmon Creek Law Offices
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OrangeSky LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Salmon Creek Law Offices
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OrangeSky LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Salmon Creek Law Offices in 2025.

Incident History — OrangeSky LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OrangeSky LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Salmon Creek Law Offices (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Salmon Creek Law Offices cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orangesky-llc.jpeg
OrangeSky LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salmon-creek-law-offices.jpeg
Salmon Creek Law Offices
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Salmon Creek Law Offices company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OrangeSky LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Salmon Creek Law Offices company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to OrangeSky LLC company.

In the current year, Salmon Creek Law Offices company and OrangeSky LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Salmon Creek Law Offices company nor OrangeSky LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Salmon Creek Law Offices company nor OrangeSky LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Salmon Creek Law Offices company nor OrangeSky LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither OrangeSky LLC company nor Salmon Creek Law Offices company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither OrangeSky LLC nor Salmon Creek Law Offices holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither OrangeSky LLC company nor Salmon Creek Law Offices company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Salmon Creek Law Offices company employs more people globally than OrangeSky LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither OrangeSky LLC nor Salmon Creek Law Offices holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OrangeSky LLC nor Salmon Creek Law Offices holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OrangeSky LLC nor Salmon Creek Law Offices holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OrangeSky LLC nor Salmon Creek Law Offices holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OrangeSky LLC nor Salmon Creek Law Offices holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OrangeSky LLC nor Salmon Creek Law Offices holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X