Comparison Overview

OrangeSky LLC

VS

Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee

OrangeSky LLC

201 1st Ave W, Albany, 97321, US
Last Update: 2025-11-30
Between 750 and 799

Partnering with corporate legal teams since 2010. We care a lot about your IP Portfolio, so you can shift focus to your brand strategies and client service. Our IP professionals provide specialized, value-add industry knowledge to everything we touch. We are not Attorneys. We work with in-house Attorneys and Para-professionals within corporate legal teams to help keep track of all of your data, documents and deadlines.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee

100 Hancock Street, Quincy, Massachusetts, 02171, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee (MHLAC) has over forty five years of experience in legal and policy advocacy as well as in expert assistance to those concerned about issues affecting persons with mental health needs. It trains judges, attorneys, and advocates; suggests, interprets, and analyzes legislation; and produces brochures and other publications on legal matters pertinent to its constituents. MHLAC also provides advice and direct representation on a wide variety of issues, including: access to mental health services, treatment rights, equitable treatment in custody and visitation matters, guardianship abuse, insurance discrimination, educational rights, and mistreatment in institutional and community settings.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orangesky-llc.jpeg
OrangeSky LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OrangeSky LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OrangeSky LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee in 2025.

Incident History — OrangeSky LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OrangeSky LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orangesky-llc.jpeg
OrangeSky LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mental-health-legal-advisors.jpeg
Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee
Incidents

FAQ

OrangeSky LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to OrangeSky LLC company.

In the current year, Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee company and OrangeSky LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee company nor OrangeSky LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee company nor OrangeSky LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee company nor OrangeSky LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither OrangeSky LLC company nor Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither OrangeSky LLC nor Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither OrangeSky LLC company nor Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee company employs more people globally than OrangeSky LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither OrangeSky LLC nor Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OrangeSky LLC nor Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OrangeSky LLC nor Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OrangeSky LLC nor Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OrangeSky LLC nor Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OrangeSky LLC nor Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X