Comparison Overview

Orangebox

VS

Airsprung Beds

Orangebox

Parc Nantgarw, Cardiff, CF15 7QU, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

At Orangebox, we’re proud to design sustainable, beautiful products that quietly improve the workplace - shaped around real people and the way they live and work. For over two decades, we’ve championed people-focussed environments that prioritise wellbeing and ease - designed in Wales, made responsibly, and trusted globally. Our new London showroom brings this ethos to life: a collaborative space that reflects how we think, create, and evolve.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 251
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Airsprung Beds

Canal Road, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, GB, BA14 8RQ
Last Update: 2025-11-24

Airsprung Beds is one of the UK’s leading bed manufacturers. Formed in 1871 in Trowbridge, Wiltshire, by Hedley Chapman, his vision and commitment to quality ensured that the company has always been at the forefront of technical innovation, and was one of the first in the UK to manufacture the interior sprung mattress in the 1930`s. Today, the company is one the largest single site furniture manufacturer in the UK, and markets a wide range of mattresses, divans, headboards and metal and wooden bedsteads. The combination of the latest technology with traditional skills ensures that every product that leaves the factory, meets Airsprung Beds’ own rigorous quality standards. Quality and value for money are the cornerstone of the company`s success. Their research, development and design teams are constantly striving for technical and innovative improvements that will ensure Airsprung Beds` position at the forefront of mattress and divan manufacture.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orangebox.jpeg
Orangebox
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airsprung-beds.jpeg
Airsprung Beds
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Orangebox
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Airsprung Beds
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orangebox in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Airsprung Beds in 2025.

Incident History — Orangebox (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orangebox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Airsprung Beds (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Airsprung Beds cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orangebox.jpeg
Orangebox
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airsprung-beds.jpeg
Airsprung Beds
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Orangebox company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Airsprung Beds company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Airsprung Beds company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Orangebox company.

In the current year, Airsprung Beds company and Orangebox company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Airsprung Beds company nor Orangebox company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Airsprung Beds company nor Orangebox company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Airsprung Beds company nor Orangebox company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Orangebox company nor Airsprung Beds company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Orangebox nor Airsprung Beds holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Orangebox company nor Airsprung Beds company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Orangebox company employs more people globally than Airsprung Beds company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Orangebox nor Airsprung Beds holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Orangebox nor Airsprung Beds holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Orangebox nor Airsprung Beds holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Orangebox nor Airsprung Beds holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Orangebox nor Airsprung Beds holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Orangebox nor Airsprung Beds holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.