Comparison Overview

Orange Madagascar

VS

KPN

Orange Madagascar

La Tour, Rue Ravoninahitriniarivo, Ankorondrano, Antananarivo, 00101, MG
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 600 and 649

Orange Madagascar, acteur majeur dans l'économie de Madagascar, leader sur le secteur des télécommunications, opère sur la voix, l'internet, les solutions d'entreprise et le mobile banking. Notre ambition au quotidien est d'offrir à nos clients une expérience client incomparable, et nous focalisons en permanence nos énergies sur cet objectif. Orange contribue et accompagne le développement de Madagascar à travers sa forte politique de responsabilité sociétale, à travers des collaborateurs engagés au service des clients, et avec l'ensemble des partenaires du tissu économique et social de la Grande île.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 888
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

KPN

Wilhelminakade 123, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, 3072 AP, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Welkom bij de LinkedIn pagina van KPN. Sinds jaar en dag maakt KPN technologie toegankelijk. Hier leest u alles over de ontwikkelingen rondom de thema’s die KPN belangrijk vindt, zoals Het Nieuwe Leven & Werken, Veiligheid & Privacy en ICT-infrastructuur. Ook een transparante en betrouwbare dienstverlener zijn, efficiency in de zorg en duurzaam ondernemen staan bij ons hoog in het vaandel. Op onze pagina blijft u op de hoogte van het laatste nieuws rondom onze activiteiten, de thema’s in uw leven waarin technologie een rol speelt en onze producten en services op het gebied van ICT. Ontdek samen met ons voor u en uw organisatie de beste oplossingen en voel je vrij.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 17,597
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orange-madagascar.jpeg
Orange Madagascar
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpn.jpeg
KPN
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Orange Madagascar
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KPN
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

Orange Madagascar has 31.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPN in 2025.

Incident History — Orange Madagascar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orange Madagascar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KPN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orange-madagascar.jpeg
Orange Madagascar
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Phishing sites
Motivation: Financial gain (ransom)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpn.jpeg
KPN
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

KPN company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Orange Madagascar company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Orange Madagascar company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas KPN company has not reported any.

In the current year, Orange Madagascar company has reported more cyber incidents than KPN company.

Orange Madagascar company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while KPN company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither KPN company nor Orange Madagascar company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KPN company nor Orange Madagascar company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Orange Madagascar company nor KPN company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Orange Madagascar nor KPN holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

KPN company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Orange Madagascar company.

KPN company employs more people globally than Orange Madagascar company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Orange Madagascar nor KPN holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Orange Madagascar nor KPN holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Orange Madagascar nor KPN holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Orange Madagascar nor KPN holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Orange Madagascar nor KPN holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Orange Madagascar nor KPN holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N