Comparison Overview

Orange County Business Council

VS

Mississippi First

Orange County Business Council

2 Park Plaza, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92614, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ocbc.org/

For 30 years, Orange County Business Council (OCBC) has been representing and promoting the region’s business community together with government and academia to enhance the economic development of the nation’s sixth most populous county. The Council’s core initiatives include developing pro-business solutions that lead to economic growth, education development that leads to a competitive workforce, advocating for a range of housing, and advocating for adequate investment in regional and statewide infrastructure. Member organizations include businesses and local organizations representing a diverse cross section of industries including biomedical, construction, education, financial services, health care, manufacturing, municipalities, nonprofit, real estate, technology, tourism, transportation, and utilities.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mississippi First

125 S. Congress Street, Suite 1510, Jackson, 39201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749
http://www.mississippifirst.org/

Mississippi First is a registered 501(c)3 nonprofit. We are a leading voice for state-funded pre-K, high-quality public charter schools, commonsense testing policies, and teacher quality research. Mississippi First is dedicated to producing and providing documents and resources that will help to raise public awareness around key education reform issues in Mississippi.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orange-county-business-council.jpeg
Orange County Business Council
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mississippi-first.jpeg
Mississippi First
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Orange County Business Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mississippi First
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orange County Business Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mississippi First in 2025.

Incident History — Orange County Business Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orange County Business Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mississippi First (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mississippi First cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orange-county-business-council.jpeg
Orange County Business Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mississippi-first.jpeg
Mississippi First
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Orange County Business Council company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mississippi First company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mississippi First company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Orange County Business Council company.

In the current year, Mississippi First company and Orange County Business Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mississippi First company nor Orange County Business Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mississippi First company nor Orange County Business Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mississippi First company nor Orange County Business Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Orange County Business Council company nor Mississippi First company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Orange County Business Council nor Mississippi First holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Orange County Business Council company nor Mississippi First company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Orange County Business Council company employs more people globally than Mississippi First company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Orange County Business Council nor Mississippi First holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Orange County Business Council nor Mississippi First holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Orange County Business Council nor Mississippi First holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Orange County Business Council nor Mississippi First holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Orange County Business Council nor Mississippi First holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Orange County Business Council nor Mississippi First holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References