Comparison Overview

Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys

VS

Krueger & Juelich, PLLC

Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys

245 Fischer Ave, Costa Mesa, 92626, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Oracle Law Firm, LLP is a premier workers'​ compensation, personal injury and employment law firm representing injured clients throughout California. Oracle means a person regarded as a source of wise counsel or visionary ideas. Our mission is to be our clients'​ Oracle; lawyers who are trusted advisers. Our attorneys pride themselves on helping clients navigate through complex legal problems. All of our professionals can clearly and ethically provide you the best representation possible. We zealously represent our clients in negotiations and before the Courts. Our lawyers chose this profession not for glitz and glamour, but to actually make a positive difference for others. Our professionals continuously receive the highest honors and praises among their peer.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Krueger & Juelich, PLLC

601 Carlson Parkway, Minnetonka, Minnesota, 55305, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Krueger & Juelich , PLLC is a Professional Family Law and Estate Planning law firm in the St. Paul and Minneapolis metro area. In addition to representing clients in all phases of family law litigation and settlement, Krueger & Juelich provides alternative dispute resolution services for Family Law issues.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oraclelawfirm.jpeg
Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/krueger-&-juelich-pllc.jpeg
Krueger & Juelich, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Krueger & Juelich, PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Krueger & Juelich, PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Krueger & Juelich, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Krueger & Juelich, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oraclelawfirm.jpeg
Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/krueger-&-juelich-pllc.jpeg
Krueger & Juelich, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys company.

In the current year, Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company and Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company nor Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company nor Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company nor Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys company nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys company nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys company employs more people globally than Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Oracle Law Firm | Accident & Injury Attorneys nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X